TSTP Solution File: GRP699-1 by Twee---2.5.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.5.0
% Problem  : GRP699-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 07:13:29 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.43s
% Output   : Proof 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GRP699-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 12:41:09 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.44  Axiom 1 (c06): mult(unit, X) = X.
% 0.18/0.44  Axiom 2 (c02): ld(X, mult(X, Y)) = Y.
% 0.18/0.44  Axiom 3 (c01): mult(X, ld(X, Y)) = Y.
% 0.18/0.44  Axiom 4 (c08): mult(mult(X, Y), mult(Y, mult(Z, Y))) = mult(mult(X, mult(Y, mult(Y, Z))), Y).
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Goal 1 (goals): mult(mult(a, b), c) = mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(b, c))).
% 0.18/0.44  Proof:
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), c)
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 2 (c02) R->L }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, mult(c, mult(c, ld(c, ld(c, b))))), mult(mult(a, mult(c, mult(c, ld(c, ld(c, b))))), c)))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 4 (c08) R->L }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, mult(c, mult(c, ld(c, ld(c, b))))), mult(mult(a, c), mult(c, mult(ld(c, ld(c, b)), c)))))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 3 (c01) }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, mult(c, ld(c, b))), mult(mult(a, c), mult(c, mult(ld(c, ld(c, b)), c)))))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 2 (c02) R->L }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, mult(c, ld(c, b))), mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(c, mult(c, mult(ld(c, ld(c, b)), c)))))))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 1 (c06) R->L }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, mult(c, ld(c, b))), mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(mult(unit, c), mult(c, mult(ld(c, ld(c, b)), c)))))))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 4 (c08) }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, mult(c, ld(c, b))), mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(mult(unit, mult(c, mult(c, ld(c, ld(c, b))))), c)))))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 1 (c06) }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, mult(c, ld(c, b))), mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(mult(c, mult(c, ld(c, ld(c, b)))), c)))))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 3 (c01) }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, mult(c, ld(c, b))), mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(mult(c, ld(c, b)), c)))))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 3 (c01) }
% 0.18/0.44    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, b), mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(mult(c, ld(c, b)), c)))))
% 0.18/0.44  = { by axiom 3 (c01) }
% 0.18/0.45    mult(mult(a, b), ld(mult(a, b), mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(b, c)))))
% 0.18/0.45  = { by axiom 3 (c01) }
% 0.18/0.45    mult(mult(a, c), ld(c, mult(b, c)))
% 0.18/0.45  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------