TSTP Solution File: GRP699-1 by Toma---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Toma---0.4
% Problem  : GRP699-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : toma --casc %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:16:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.83s 3.12s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GRP699-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : toma --casc %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 01:48:46 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 2.83/3.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.83/3.12  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.83/3.12  original problem:
% 2.83/3.12  axioms:
% 2.83/3.12  mult(A, ld(A, B)) = B
% 2.83/3.12  ld(A, mult(A, B)) = B
% 2.83/3.12  mult(rd(A, B), B) = A
% 2.83/3.12  rd(mult(A, B), B) = A
% 2.83/3.12  mult(A, unit()) = A
% 2.83/3.12  mult(unit(), A) = A
% 2.83/3.12  mult(mult(mult(A, B), A), mult(A, C)) = mult(A, mult(mult(mult(B, A), A), C))
% 2.83/3.12  mult(mult(A, B), mult(B, mult(C, B))) = mult(mult(A, mult(B, mult(B, C))), B)
% 2.83/3.12  goal:
% 2.83/3.12  mult(mult(a(), b()), c()) != mult(mult(a(), c()), ld(c(), mult(b(), c())))
% 2.83/3.12  To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 2.83/3.12  it suffices to show that mult(mult(a(), b()), c()) = mult(mult(a(), c()), ld(c(), mult(b(), c()))) (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 2.83/3.12  Here is an equational proof:
% 2.83/3.12  0: mult(X0, ld(X0, X1)) = X1.
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: Axiom.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  1: ld(X0, mult(X0, X1)) = X1.
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: Axiom.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  5: mult(unit(), X0) = X0.
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: Axiom.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  7: mult(mult(X0, X1), mult(X1, mult(X2, X1))) = mult(mult(X0, mult(X1, mult(X1, X2))), X1).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: Axiom.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  19: mult(mult(unit(), X1), mult(X1, mult(X2, X1))) = mult(mult(X1, mult(X1, X2)), X1).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: A critical pair between equations 7 and 5.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  23: mult(X1, mult(X1, mult(X2, X1))) = mult(mult(X1, mult(X1, X2)), X1).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: Rewrite equation 19,
% 2.83/3.12                 lhs with equations [5]
% 2.83/3.12                 rhs with equations [].
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  71: mult(X3, mult(X3, mult(ld(X3, X4), X3))) = mult(mult(X3, X4), X3).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: A critical pair between equations 23 and 0.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  80: mult(X5, mult(X5, mult(ld(X5, ld(X5, X6)), X5))) = mult(X6, X5).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: A critical pair between equations 71 and 0.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  98: mult(X7, mult(ld(X7, ld(X7, X8)), X7)) = ld(X7, mult(X8, X7)).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: A critical pair between equations 1 and 80.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  179: mult(ld(X9, ld(X9, X10)), X9) = ld(X9, ld(X9, mult(X10, X9))).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: A critical pair between equations 1 and 98.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  279: mult(mult(X0, X3), mult(X3, mult(ld(X3, X4), X3))) = mult(mult(X0, mult(X3, X4)), X3).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: A critical pair between equations 7 and 0.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  295: mult(mult(X0, X5), mult(X5, mult(ld(X5, ld(X5, X6)), X5))) = mult(mult(X0, X6), X5).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: A critical pair between equations 279 and 0.
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  299: mult(mult(X0, X5), ld(X5, mult(X6, X5))) = mult(mult(X0, X6), X5).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: Rewrite equation 295,
% 2.83/3.12                 lhs with equations [179,0]
% 2.83/3.12                 rhs with equations [].
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  301: mult(mult(a(), b()), c()) = mult(mult(a(), c()), ld(c(), mult(b(), c()))).
% 2.83/3.12  Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations []
% 2.83/3.12                 rhs with equations [299].
% 2.83/3.12  
% 2.83/3.12  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------