TSTP Solution File: GRP699-1 by E-SAT---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.2.0
% Problem : GRP699-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d SAT
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:56:52 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c08,axiom,
mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X2,mult(X3,X2))) = mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X2,X3))),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XcBwbH6NDE/E---3.1_20031.p',c08) ).
cnf(c06,axiom,
mult(unit,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XcBwbH6NDE/E---3.1_20031.p',c06) ).
cnf(c01,axiom,
mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XcBwbH6NDE/E---3.1_20031.p',c01) ).
cnf(c02,axiom,
ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XcBwbH6NDE/E---3.1_20031.p',c02) ).
cnf(goals,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(a,b),c) != mult(mult(a,c),ld(c,mult(b,c))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XcBwbH6NDE/E---3.1_20031.p',goals) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X2,mult(X3,X2))) = mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X2,X3))),X2),
c08 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
mult(unit,X1) = X1,
c06 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
mult(mult(X1,mult(X1,X2)),X1) = mult(X1,mult(X1,mult(X2,X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
c01 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
c02 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
mult(X1,mult(X1,mult(ld(X1,X2),X1))) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
ld(X1,mult(mult(X1,X2),X1)) = mult(X1,mult(ld(X1,X2),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(a,b),c) != mult(mult(a,c),ld(c,mult(b,c))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goals]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X2,mult(ld(X2,X3),X2))) = mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mult(X1,mult(ld(X1,ld(X1,X2)),X1)) = ld(X1,mult(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(a,b),c) != mult(mult(a,c),ld(c,mult(b,c))),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
mult(mult(X1,X2),ld(X2,mult(X3,X2))) = mult(mult(X1,X3),X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : GRP699-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d SAT
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 12:41:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XcBwbH6NDE/E---3.1_20031.p
% 0.22/0.55 # Version: 3.2.0
% 0.22/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # sh5l with pid 20166 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.55 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 20176 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.22/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.55 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.55 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.55
% 0.22/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.55 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.22/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.22/0.55 # Processed clauses : 82
% 0.22/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.22/0.55 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 69
% 0.22/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.22/0.55 # Generated clauses : 1490
% 0.22/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1036
% 0.22/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Paramodulations : 1490
% 0.22/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 2430
% 0.22/0.55 # ...of those cached : 2106
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 49
% 0.22/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 49
% 0.22/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 956
% 0.22/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 956
% 0.22/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.22/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 87
% 0.22/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.22/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 31463
% 0.22/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.22/0.55
% 0.22/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.22/0.55 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
% 0.22/0.55
% 0.22/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.22/0.55 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.22/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.22/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------