TSTP Solution File: GRP687-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : GRP687-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:08:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.56s 0.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : GRP687-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.30 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 12:52:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.33 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.17/0.33 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.17/0.33 #
% 0.17/0.33 # Number of axioms: 8 Number of unprocessed: 8
% 0.17/0.33 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.17/0.33 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.17/0.33 # Hello from C++
% 0.17/0.33 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.17/0.33 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.17/0.33 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.17/0.33 # 8 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.17/0.33 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.17/0.33 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.17/0.33 # Found 8 unit axioms.
% 0.17/0.33 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.17/0.33 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.17/0.33 # 8 unit axiom clauses
% 0.17/0.33
% 0.17/0.33 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.17/0.33 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.17/0.33 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.17/0.33 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.17/0.33 # Returning from population with 15 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.17/0.33 # We now have 15 tableaux to operate on
% 2.56/0.67 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 2.56/0.67 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 2.56/0.67 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 2.56/0.67 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 2.56/0.67 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 2.56/0.67 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 2.56/0.67 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 2.56/0.67 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 2.56/0.67 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.56/0.67 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.56/0.67 # Begin clausification derivation
% 2.56/0.67
% 2.56/0.67 # End clausification derivation
% 2.56/0.67 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (mult(X1,unit)=X1)).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (mult(unit,X1)=X1)).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (ld(X1,mult(X1,X2))=X2)).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (mult(X1,ld(X1,X2))=X2)).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (mult(rd(X1,X2),X2)=X1)).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (rd(mult(X1,X2),X2)=X1)).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (mult(mult(X1,mult(X1,X2)),X3)=mult(mult(X1,X1),mult(X2,X3)))).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (mult(mult(a,mult(b,b)),c)!=mult(a,mult(b,mult(b,c))))).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 2.56/0.67 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 2.56/0.67 # Begin printing tableau
% 2.56/0.67 # Found 6 steps
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (mult(X5,unit)=X5), inference(start_rule)).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (mult(X5,unit)=X5), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (mult(X3,unit)!=X3), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (ld(mult(X3,unit),mult(X5,unit))=ld(X3,X5)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (ld(X3,X5)!=mult(ld(X3,X5),unit)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 2.56/0.67 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (ld(mult(X3,unit),mult(X5,unit))=mult(ld(X3,X5),unit)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_54, ...])).
% 2.56/0.67 # End printing tableau
% 2.56/0.67 # SZS output end
% 2.56/0.67 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 2.56/0.67 # Child (9252) has found a proof.
% 2.56/0.67
% 2.56/0.67 # Proof search is over...
% 2.56/0.67 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------