TSTP Solution File: GRP679-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP679-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:42:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 15 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c07,axiom,
mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X1,X3))) = mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Hqtcr0c5uK/E---3.1_23851.p',c07) ).
cnf(c06,axiom,
mult(unit,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Hqtcr0c5uK/E---3.1_23851.p',c06) ).
cnf(c02,axiom,
ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Hqtcr0c5uK/E---3.1_23851.p',c02) ).
cnf(c08,axiom,
mult(op_c,X1) = mult(X1,op_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Hqtcr0c5uK/E---3.1_23851.p',c08) ).
cnf(goals,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(op_c,op_c),a) != mult(a,mult(op_c,op_c)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Hqtcr0c5uK/E---3.1_23851.p',goals) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X1,X3))) = mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)),X3),
c07 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
mult(unit,X1) = X1,
c06 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
c02 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
mult(op_c,X1) = mult(X1,op_c),
c08 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(op_c,op_c),a) != mult(a,mult(op_c,op_c)),
goals ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
mult(mult(X1,X1),X2) = mult(X1,mult(X1,X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
ld(op_c,mult(X1,op_c)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
mult(mult(op_c,mult(op_c,X1)),X2) = mult(op_c,mult(X1,mult(op_c,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
mult(a,mult(op_c,op_c)) != mult(op_c,mult(op_c,a)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mult(X1,mult(op_c,op_c)) = mult(op_c,mult(op_c,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : GRP679-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:42:04 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Hqtcr0c5uK/E---3.1_23851.p
% 0.16/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 23931 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.41 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.41 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 23937 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Result found by G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.16/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.41 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.41 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.41 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.16/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.16/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.16/0.41 # Processed clauses : 57
% 0.16/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.16/0.41 # ...subsumed : 13
% 0.16/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 0.16/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.16/0.41 # Generated clauses : 260
% 0.16/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 149
% 0.16/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Paramodulations : 260
% 0.16/0.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 230
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 0.16/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 0.16/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.16/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 106
% 0.16/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 106
% 0.16/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.16/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.16/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 21
% 0.16/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.16/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3403
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.41 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.41 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1512 pages
% 0.16/0.41
% 0.16/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.41 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.16/0.41 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.41 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.16/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.16/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------