TSTP Solution File: GRP665+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GRP665+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:48:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    equal(mult(u,ld(u,v)),v),
    file('GRP665+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    equal(ld(u,mult(u,v)),v),
    file('GRP665+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    equal(rd(mult(u,v),v),u),
    file('GRP665+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    equal(mult(op_c,u),mult(u,op_c)),
    file('GRP665+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    equal(mult(rd(mult(u,v),u),mult(u,w)),mult(u,mult(v,w))),
    file('GRP665+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    equal(mult(mult(u,v),ld(v,mult(w,v))),mult(mult(u,w),v)),
    file('GRP665+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc6),skc7),mult(op_c,mult(skc6,skc7)))
    | ~ equal(mult(mult(skc8,op_c),skc9),mult(skc8,mult(op_c,skc9)))
    | ~ equal(mult(mult(skc10,skc11),op_c),mult(skc10,mult(skc11,op_c))) ),
    file('GRP665+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    ( ~ equal(mult(skc10,mult(op_c,skc11)),mult(op_c,mult(skc10,skc11)))
    | ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc8),skc9),mult(skc8,mult(op_c,skc9)))
    | ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc6),skc7),mult(op_c,mult(skc6,skc7))) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,10]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:7.0,10.2,7.0,10.2,7.0,10.1')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    equal(rd(mult(u,op_c),u),op_c),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,6]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:7.0,6.0')] ).

cnf(53,plain,
    equal(ld(op_c,mult(u,op_c)),u),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,4]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:7.0,4.0')] ).

cnf(135,plain,
    equal(mult(op_c,mult(u,v)),mult(u,mult(op_c,v))),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,8]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:22.0,8.0')] ).

cnf(136,plain,
    ( ~ equal(mult(op_c,mult(skc10,skc11)),mult(op_c,mult(skc10,skc11)))
    | ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc8),skc9),mult(skc8,mult(op_c,skc9)))
    | ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc6),skc7),mult(op_c,mult(skc6,skc7))) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[135,11]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:135.0,11.0')] ).

cnf(156,plain,
    ( ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc8),skc9),mult(skc8,mult(op_c,skc9)))
    | ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc6),skc7),mult(op_c,mult(skc6,skc7))) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[136]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:136.0')] ).

cnf(157,plain,
    ( ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc8),skc9),mult(op_c,mult(skc8,skc9)))
    | ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc6),skc7),mult(op_c,mult(skc6,skc7))) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[135,156]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:135.0,156.0')] ).

cnf(267,plain,
    equal(mult(mult(u,op_c),v),mult(mult(u,v),op_c)),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[53,9]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:53.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(272,plain,
    equal(mult(mult(u,op_c),ld(u,mult(v,u))),mult(mult(op_c,v),u)),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,9]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:7.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(281,plain,
    equal(mult(mult(u,op_c),v),mult(op_c,mult(u,v))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,267]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:7.0,267.0')] ).

cnf(291,plain,
    equal(mult(op_c,mult(u,ld(u,mult(v,u)))),mult(mult(op_c,v),u)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[281,272]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:281.0,272.0')] ).

cnf(292,plain,
    equal(mult(mult(op_c,u),v),mult(op_c,mult(u,v))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,291]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:3.0,291.0')] ).

cnf(293,plain,
    ( ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc8),skc9),mult(op_c,mult(skc8,skc9)))
    | ~ equal(mult(op_c,mult(skc6,skc7)),mult(op_c,mult(skc6,skc7))) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[292,157]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:292.0,157.1')] ).

cnf(308,plain,
    ~ equal(mult(mult(op_c,skc8),skc9),mult(op_c,mult(skc8,skc9))),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[293]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:293.1')] ).

cnf(309,plain,
    ~ equal(mult(op_c,mult(skc8,skc9)),mult(op_c,mult(skc8,skc9))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[292,308]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:292.0,308.0')] ).

cnf(310,plain,
    $false,
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[309]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:309.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GRP665+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 01:09:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.47  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.47  SPASS derived 233 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 73 clauses.
% 0.19/0.47  SPASS allocated 85422 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.47  SPASS spent	0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.47  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.47  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.47  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 23 :
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.47  Formulae used in the proof : f01 f02 f04 f09 f07 f08 goals
% 0.19/0.47  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------