TSTP Solution File: GRP645+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GRP645+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:02:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.25s 27.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 142 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 179 ( 68 ~; 65 |; 33 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 1 sgn 27 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t24_latsubgr,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v3_group_1(X1)
& v4_group_1(X1)
& l1_group_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( v1_group_1(X2)
& m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( v1_group_1(X3)
& m1_group_2(X3,X1) )
=> k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),k9_group_2(X1,X2,X3)) = k3_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t24_latsubgr) ).
fof(idempotence_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : k3_xboole_0(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).
fof(t23_latsubgr,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v3_group_1(X1)
& v4_group_1(X1)
& l1_group_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( v1_group_1(X2)
& m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( v1_group_1(X3)
& m1_group_2(X3,X1) )
=> u1_struct_0(k9_group_2(X1,X2,X3)) = k3_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t23_latsubgr) ).
fof(t1_latsubgr,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v3_group_1(X1)
& v4_group_1(X1)
& l1_group_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_group_2(X2,X1)
=> ! [X3] :
( m1_group_2(X3,X1)
=> u1_struct_0(k9_group_2(X1,X2,X3)) = k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t1_latsubgr) ).
fof(dt_k9_group_2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v3_group_1(X1)
& v4_group_1(X1)
& l1_group_1(X1)
& m1_group_2(X2,X1)
& m1_group_2(X3,X1) )
=> ( v1_group_1(k9_group_2(X1,X2,X3))
& m1_group_2(k9_group_2(X1,X2,X3),X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+246.ax',dt_k9_group_2) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v3_group_1(X1)
& v4_group_1(X1)
& l1_group_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( v1_group_1(X2)
& m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( v1_group_1(X3)
& m1_group_2(X3,X1) )
=> k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),k9_group_2(X1,X2,X3)) = k3_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X3)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t24_latsubgr]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X3] : k3_xboole_0(X3,X3) = X3,
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k3_xboole_0])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( v3_struct_0(X4)
| ~ v3_group_1(X4)
| ~ v4_group_1(X4)
| ~ l1_group_1(X4)
| ~ v1_group_1(X5)
| ~ m1_group_2(X5,X4)
| ~ v1_group_1(X6)
| ~ m1_group_2(X6,X4)
| u1_struct_0(k9_group_2(X4,X5,X6)) = k3_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X4),X5),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X4),X6)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t23_latsubgr])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
& v3_group_1(esk1_0)
& v4_group_1(esk1_0)
& l1_group_1(esk1_0)
& v1_group_1(esk2_0)
& m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& v1_group_1(esk3_0)
& m1_group_2(esk3_0,esk1_0)
& k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),k9_group_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) != k3_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk3_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( v3_struct_0(X4)
| ~ v3_group_1(X4)
| ~ v4_group_1(X4)
| ~ l1_group_1(X4)
| ~ m1_group_2(X5,X4)
| ~ m1_group_2(X6,X4)
| u1_struct_0(k9_group_2(X4,X5,X6)) = k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X5),u1_struct_0(X6)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t1_latsubgr])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
k3_xboole_0(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k9_group_2(X1,X2,X3)) = k3_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X3))
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X3)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X2)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),k9_group_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) != k3_xboole_0(k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk3_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
m1_group_2(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
v4_group_1(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
v3_group_1(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
v1_group_1(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
v1_group_1(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
l1_group_1(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k9_group_2(X1,X2,X3)) = k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X3))
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k9_group_2(X1,X2,X2)) = k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X2)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),k9_group_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) != u1_struct_0(k9_group_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2) = u1_struct_0(X2)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X2)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( v1_group_1(k9_group_2(X4,X5,X6))
| v3_struct_0(X4)
| ~ v3_group_1(X4)
| ~ v4_group_1(X4)
| ~ l1_group_1(X4)
| ~ m1_group_2(X5,X4)
| ~ m1_group_2(X6,X4) )
& ( m1_group_2(k9_group_2(X4,X5,X6),X4)
| v3_struct_0(X4)
| ~ v3_group_1(X4)
| ~ v4_group_1(X4)
| ~ l1_group_1(X4)
| ~ m1_group_2(X5,X4)
| ~ m1_group_2(X6,X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_k9_group_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m1_group_2(k9_group_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk1_0)
| ~ v1_group_1(k9_group_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X2)
| v1_group_1(k9_group_2(X2,X3,X1))
| ~ m1_group_2(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_group_2(X3,X2)
| ~ l1_group_1(X2)
| ~ v4_group_1(X2)
| ~ v3_group_1(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_group_2(k9_group_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk1_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_14]),c_0_13]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X2)
| m1_group_2(k9_group_2(X2,X3,X1),X2)
| ~ m1_group_2(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_group_2(X3,X2)
| ~ l1_group_1(X2)
| ~ v4_group_1(X2)
| ~ v3_group_1(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_14]),c_0_13]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : GRP645+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 19:05:44 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.24/25.25 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.24/25.26 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.25/27.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 2.25/27.43
% 2.25/27.43 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 2.25/27.43 # OLD status Res
% 2.25/27.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 2.25/27.43 # Preprocessing time : 1.413 s
% 2.25/27.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 2.25/27.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 2.25/27.43 # Preprocessing time : 1.234 s
% 2.25/27.43
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof found!
% 2.25/27.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 2.25/27.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object total steps : 31
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object clause steps : 20
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object conjectures : 16
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 13
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 14
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 2.25/27.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 29
% 2.25/27.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 2.25/27.43 # Parsed axioms : 36514
% 2.25/27.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 36422
% 2.25/27.43 # Initial clauses : 143
% 2.25/27.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 2.25/27.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 143
% 2.25/27.43 # Processed clauses : 4129
% 2.25/27.43 # ...of these trivial : 1557
% 2.25/27.43 # ...subsumed : 1908
% 2.25/27.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 664
% 2.25/27.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 78
% 2.25/27.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.25/27.43 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 2.25/27.43 # Backward-rewritten : 15
% 2.25/27.43 # Generated clauses : 53360
% 2.25/27.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 44356
% 2.25/27.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 334
% 2.25/27.43 # Paramodulations : 53252
% 2.25/27.43 # Factorizations : 4
% 2.25/27.43 # Equation resolutions : 104
% 2.25/27.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 644
% 2.25/27.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 152
% 2.25/27.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 2.25/27.43 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 2.25/27.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 480
% 2.25/27.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 39328
% 2.25/27.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 122951
% 2.25/27.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.25/27.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 2.25/27.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 115536
% 2.25/27.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43967
% 2.25/27.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2078
% 2.25/27.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2216
% 2.25/27.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.25/27.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1229
% 2.25/27.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 68
% 2.25/27.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.25/27.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.25/27.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1930706
% 2.25/27.43
% 2.25/27.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.25/27.43 # User time : 1.832 s
% 2.25/27.43 # System time : 0.073 s
% 2.25/27.43 # Total time : 1.905 s
% 2.25/27.43 # Maximum resident set size: 108044 pages
% 2.25/39.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/39.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/39.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.31 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.25/40.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.34 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.34 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.35 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.35 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.36 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.36 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.36 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.36 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.37 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.37 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.37 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.37 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.38 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.38 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.39 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.25/40.39 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.60 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.25/40.63 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.63 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.63 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.63 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.64 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.64 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.64 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.64 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.65 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.65 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.66 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.66 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.66 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.66 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.25/40.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/40.68 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------