TSTP Solution File: GRP644+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GRP644+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 08:39:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.19s 2.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 22 unt; 8 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 93 ( 0 equ; 57 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_32,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(k3_group_1(X1,X2),u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_32) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
l1_group_1(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
v4_group_1(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
v3_group_1(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_86,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_rlvect_1(X2,k3_group_1(X1,X3))
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ r1_rlvect_1(X2,X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_86) ).
cnf(i_0_79,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_rlvect_1(X2,X3)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X2)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ r2_hidden(X3,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_79) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
r2_hidden(esk3_0,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
v1_group_1(esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_78,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| r2_hidden(X2,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X3))
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X3)
| ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
| ~ r1_rlvect_1(X3,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_78) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ r2_hidden(k3_group_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o1i2cte2/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_100,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(k3_group_1(X1,X2),u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
i_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
l1_group_1(esk1_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
v4_group_1(esk1_0),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
v3_group_1(esk1_0),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_106,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_rlvect_1(X2,k3_group_1(X1,X3))
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ r1_rlvect_1(X2,X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
i_0_86 ).
cnf(c_0_107,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_rlvect_1(X2,X3)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X2)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ r2_hidden(X3,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)) ),
i_0_79 ).
cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
r2_hidden(esk3_0,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0)),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
v1_group_1(esk2_0),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_111,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| r2_hidden(X2,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X3))
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X3)
| ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
| ~ r1_rlvect_1(X3,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
i_0_78 ).
cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(k3_group_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]),c_0_102]),c_0_103]),c_0_104])]),c_0_105]) ).
cnf(c_0_113,negated_conjecture,
( r1_rlvect_1(X1,k3_group_1(esk1_0,esk3_0))
| ~ r1_rlvect_1(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ m1_group_2(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_101]),c_0_102]),c_0_103]),c_0_104])]),c_0_105]) ).
cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
r1_rlvect_1(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]),c_0_101]),c_0_109]),c_0_110]),c_0_102]),c_0_103]),c_0_104])]),c_0_105]) ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
( r2_hidden(k3_group_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),X1))
| ~ r1_rlvect_1(X1,k3_group_1(esk1_0,esk3_0))
| ~ m1_group_2(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ v1_group_1(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112]),c_0_102]),c_0_103]),c_0_104])]),c_0_105]) ).
cnf(c_0_116,negated_conjecture,
r1_rlvect_1(esk2_0,k3_group_1(esk1_0,esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_114]),c_0_109])]) ).
cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
~ r2_hidden(k3_group_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0)),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_118,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_116]),c_0_109]),c_0_110])]),c_0_117]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : GRP644+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 06:44:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.19/2.52 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.19/2.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.19/2.52 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.19/2.52 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 8.19/2.52 # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 8.19/2.52 #
% 8.19/2.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 8.19/2.52
% 8.19/2.52 # Proof found!
% 8.19/2.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.19/2.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.19/2.52 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.19/2.52
% 8.19/2.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.19/2.52 # User time : 0.045 s
% 8.19/2.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.19/2.52 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 8.19/2.52 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.19/2.52
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------