TSTP Solution File: GRP642+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GRP642+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 08:39:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 12.99s 5.91s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 16 unt; 2 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 4 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_312,plain,
( X1 != k1_xboole_0
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_312) ).
cnf(i_0_2673,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2))
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X2)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_2673) ).
cnf(i_0_2900,negated_conjecture,
m1_group_2(esk453_0,esk452_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_2900) ).
cnf(i_0_2899,negated_conjecture,
k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk452_0),esk453_0) = k1_xboole_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_2899) ).
cnf(i_0_2903,negated_conjecture,
v4_group_1(esk452_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_2903) ).
cnf(i_0_2904,negated_conjecture,
v3_group_1(esk452_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_2904) ).
cnf(i_0_2901,negated_conjecture,
v1_group_1(esk453_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_2901) ).
cnf(i_0_2902,negated_conjecture,
l1_group_1(esk452_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_2902) ).
cnf(i_0_2905,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk452_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9aib3w6z/lgb.p',i_0_2905) ).
cnf(c_0_2915,plain,
( X1 != k1_xboole_0
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
i_0_312 ).
cnf(c_0_2916,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2))
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X2)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2673 ).
cnf(c_0_2917,negated_conjecture,
m1_group_2(esk453_0,esk452_0),
i_0_2900 ).
cnf(c_0_2918,negated_conjecture,
k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk452_0),esk453_0) = k1_xboole_0,
i_0_2899 ).
cnf(c_0_2919,negated_conjecture,
v4_group_1(esk452_0),
i_0_2903 ).
cnf(c_0_2920,negated_conjecture,
v3_group_1(esk452_0),
i_0_2904 ).
cnf(c_0_2921,negated_conjecture,
v1_group_1(esk453_0),
i_0_2901 ).
cnf(c_0_2922,negated_conjecture,
l1_group_1(esk452_0),
i_0_2902 ).
cnf(c_0_2923,plain,
~ r2_hidden(X1,k1_xboole_0),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2915]) ).
cnf(c_0_2924,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk452_0),
i_0_2905 ).
cnf(c_0_2925,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2916,c_0_2917]),c_0_2918]),c_0_2919]),c_0_2920]),c_0_2921]),c_0_2922])]),c_0_2923]),c_0_2924]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GRP642+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 07:40:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.53/1.72 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.53/1.72 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 1.53/1.72 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 1.53/1.72 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 12.99/5.91 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 12.99/5.91 # No SInE strategy applied
% 12.99/5.91 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 12.99/5.91 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S079N
% 12.99/5.91 # and selection function SelectGrCQArEqFirst.
% 12.99/5.91 #
% 12.99/5.91 # Preprocessing time : 0.031 s
% 12.99/5.91 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 12.99/5.91
% 12.99/5.91 # Proof found!
% 12.99/5.91 # SZS status Theorem
% 12.99/5.91 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.99/5.91 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.99/5.91
% 12.99/5.91 # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.99/5.91 # User time : 0.066 s
% 12.99/5.91 # System time : 0.006 s
% 12.99/5.91 # Total time : 0.072 s
% 12.99/5.91 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 12.99/5.91
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------