TSTP Solution File: GRP642+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GRP642+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:02:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.07s 4.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (  25   ~;  16   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   3 sgn  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t20_latsubgr,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
            & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
         => k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2) != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t20_latsubgr) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = k1_xboole_0
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t19_latsubgr,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
            & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
         => r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t19_latsubgr) ).

fof(t51_card_1,axiom,
    np__0 = k1_xboole_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+54.ax',t51_card_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v3_group_1(X1)
          & v4_group_1(X1)
          & l1_group_1(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
              & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
           => k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2) != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t20_latsubgr]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v3_group_1(esk1_0)
    & v4_group_1(esk1_0)
    & l1_group_1(esk1_0)
    & v1_group_1(esk2_0)
    & m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3] :
      ( ( X3 != k1_xboole_0
        | ~ r2_hidden(X4,X3) )
      & ( r2_hidden(esk3_1(X3),X3)
        | X3 = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X3)
      | ~ v3_group_1(X3)
      | ~ v4_group_1(X3)
      | ~ l1_group_1(X3)
      | ~ v1_group_1(X4)
      | ~ m1_group_2(X4,X3)
      | r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X3),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X3),X4)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t19_latsubgr])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    np__0 = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[t51_card_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X2 != k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0) = np__0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    v1_group_1(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( X1 != np__0
    | ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    r2_hidden(k2_group_1(esk1_0),np__0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GRP642+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 07:45:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.07/4.26  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 2.07/4.26  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 2.07/4.26  # Preprocessing time       : 1.321 s
% 2.07/4.26  
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof found!
% 2.07/4.26  # SZS status Theorem
% 2.07/4.26  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object conjectures             : 13
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 2.07/4.26  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 2.07/4.26  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 2.07/4.26  # Parsed axioms                        : 36510
% 2.07/4.26  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 36409
% 2.07/4.26  # Initial clauses                      : 218
% 2.07/4.26  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 10
% 2.07/4.26  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 208
% 2.07/4.26  # Processed clauses                    : 219
% 2.07/4.26  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 2.07/4.26  # ...subsumed                          : 9
% 2.07/4.26  # ...remaining for further processing  : 208
% 2.07/4.26  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 2.07/4.26  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.07/4.26  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.07/4.26  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 2.07/4.26  # Generated clauses                    : 699
% 2.07/4.26  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 612
% 2.07/4.26  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 25
% 2.07/4.26  # Paramodulations                      : 689
% 2.07/4.26  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 2.07/4.26  # Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 2.07/4.26  # Current number of processed clauses  : 203
% 2.07/4.26  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
% 2.07/4.26  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.07/4.26  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 2.07/4.26  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 165
% 2.07/4.26  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 581
% 2.07/4.26  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3441
% 2.07/4.26  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.07/4.26  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 2.07/4.26  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13914
% 2.07/4.26  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2526
% 2.07/4.26  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 34
% 2.07/4.26  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 945
% 2.07/4.26  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.07/4.26  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 2.07/4.26  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 2.07/4.26  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.07/4.26  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.07/4.26  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1127444
% 2.07/4.26  
% 2.07/4.26  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.07/4.26  # User time                : 1.285 s
% 2.07/4.26  # System time              : 0.064 s
% 2.07/4.26  # Total time               : 1.349 s
% 2.07/4.26  # Maximum resident set size: 86136 pages
% 2.07/15.97  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/15.97  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/15.97  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/15.97  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/15.98  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/15.98  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/15.98  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/15.98  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/15.98  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/15.98  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/15.99  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/15.99  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/15.99  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/15.99  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/15.99  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/15.99  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.00  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/16.00  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.00  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/16.00  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.01  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.07/16.01  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.26  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.26  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.26  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.26  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.27  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.27  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.27  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.27  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.28  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.28  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.29  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.29  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.07/16.29  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.07/16.29  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------