TSTP Solution File: GRP642+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GRP642+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:02:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.92s 2.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 69 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 70 ( 26 ~; 17 |; 20 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 2 sgn 15 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t20_latsubgr,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v3_group_1(X1)
& v4_group_1(X1)
& l1_group_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( v1_group_1(X2)
& m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
=> k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2) != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t20_latsubgr) ).
fof(d5_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
<=> X1 = k1_xboole_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',d5_xboole_0) ).
fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
? [X1] : v1_xboole_0(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',rc1_xboole_0) ).
fof(t19_latsubgr,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v3_group_1(X1)
& v4_group_1(X1)
& l1_group_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( v1_group_1(X2)
& m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
=> r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t19_latsubgr) ).
fof(t7_boole,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
~ ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
& v1_xboole_0(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+3.ax',t7_boole) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v3_group_1(X1)
& v4_group_1(X1)
& l1_group_1(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( v1_group_1(X2)
& m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
=> k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2) != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t20_latsubgr]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| X2 = k1_xboole_0 )
& ( X2 != k1_xboole_0
| v1_xboole_0(X2) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_xboole_0])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
v1_xboole_0(esk21_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc1_xboole_0])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( v3_struct_0(X3)
| ~ v3_group_1(X3)
| ~ v4_group_1(X3)
| ~ l1_group_1(X3)
| ~ v1_group_1(X4)
| ~ m1_group_2(X4,X3)
| r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X3),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X3),X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t19_latsubgr])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
& v3_group_1(esk1_0)
& v4_group_1(esk1_0)
& l1_group_1(esk1_0)
& v1_group_1(esk2_0)
& m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
v1_xboole_0(esk21_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ r2_hidden(X3,X4)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_boole])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2))
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
| ~ v1_group_1(X2)
| ~ l1_group_1(X1)
| ~ v4_group_1(X1)
| ~ v3_group_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
v4_group_1(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
v3_group_1(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
v1_group_1(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
l1_group_1(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
k1_xboole_0 = esk21_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
r2_hidden(k2_group_1(esk1_0),esk21_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : GRP642+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 11:05:05 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.92/2.10 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.92/2.10 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.92/2.10 # Preprocessing time : 0.376 s
% 0.92/2.10
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof found!
% 0.92/2.10 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/2.10 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object total steps : 25
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object clause steps : 14
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object conjectures : 12
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object clause conjectures : 9
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 0.92/2.10 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.92/2.10 # Parsed axioms : 13984
% 0.92/2.10 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 13883
% 0.92/2.10 # Initial clauses : 194
% 0.92/2.10 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 10
% 0.92/2.10 # Initial clauses in saturation : 184
% 0.92/2.10 # Processed clauses : 218
% 0.92/2.10 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.92/2.10 # ...subsumed : 14
% 0.92/2.10 # ...remaining for further processing : 197
% 0.92/2.10 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.92/2.10 # Backward-rewritten : 58
% 0.92/2.10 # Generated clauses : 496
% 0.92/2.10 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 477
% 0.92/2.10 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 23
% 0.92/2.10 # Paramodulations : 486
% 0.92/2.10 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Equation resolutions : 8
% 0.92/2.10 # Current number of processed clauses : 136
% 0.92/2.10 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.92/2.10 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.92/2.10 # Non-unit-clauses : 100
% 0.92/2.10 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 306
% 0.92/2.10 # ...number of literals in the above : 1645
% 0.92/2.10 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Current number of archived clauses : 59
% 0.92/2.10 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4164
% 0.92/2.10 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1162
% 0.92/2.10 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 37
% 0.92/2.10 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1163
% 0.92/2.10 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.92/2.10 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.92/2.10 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Termbank termtop insertions : 365135
% 0.92/2.10
% 0.92/2.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.92/2.10 # User time : 0.376 s
% 0.92/2.10 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.92/2.10 # Total time : 0.393 s
% 0.92/2.10 # Maximum resident set size: 32336 pages
% 0.92/24.10 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.92/24.10 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.92/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.92/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.92/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------