TSTP Solution File: GRP641+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GRP641+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:02:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.05s 4.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  149 (  56   ~;  53   |;  26   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t19_latsubgr,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
            & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
         => r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t19_latsubgr) ).

fof(t53_group_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_group_2(X2,X1)
         => k2_group_1(X2) = k2_group_1(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+246.ax',t53_group_2) ).

fof(t18_latsubgr,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
            & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
         => ! [X3] :
              ( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
             => ( r2_hidden(X3,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2))
              <=> r1_rlvect_1(X2,X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t18_latsubgr) ).

fof(t56_group_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_group_2(X2,X1)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( m1_group_2(X3,X1)
             => r1_rlvect_1(X3,k2_group_1(X2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+246.ax',t56_group_2) ).

fof(dt_k2_group_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => m1_subset_1(k2_group_1(X1),u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+212.ax',dt_k2_group_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v3_group_1(X1)
          & v4_group_1(X1)
          & l1_group_1(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
              & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
           => r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t19_latsubgr]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X3)
      | ~ v3_group_1(X3)
      | ~ v4_group_1(X3)
      | ~ l1_group_1(X3)
      | ~ m1_group_2(X4,X3)
      | k2_group_1(X4) = k2_group_1(X3) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t53_group_2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v3_group_1(esk1_0)
    & v4_group_1(esk1_0)
    & l1_group_1(esk1_0)
    & v1_group_1(esk2_0)
    & m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & ~ r2_hidden(k2_group_1(esk1_0),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ r2_hidden(X6,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X4),X5))
        | r1_rlvect_1(X5,X6)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X6,u1_struct_0(X4))
        | ~ v1_group_1(X5)
        | ~ m1_group_2(X5,X4)
        | v3_struct_0(X4)
        | ~ v3_group_1(X4)
        | ~ v4_group_1(X4)
        | ~ l1_group_1(X4) )
      & ( ~ r1_rlvect_1(X5,X6)
        | r2_hidden(X6,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X4),X5))
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X6,u1_struct_0(X4))
        | ~ v1_group_1(X5)
        | ~ m1_group_2(X5,X4)
        | v3_struct_0(X4)
        | ~ v3_group_1(X4)
        | ~ v4_group_1(X4)
        | ~ l1_group_1(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t18_latsubgr])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X4)
      | ~ v3_group_1(X4)
      | ~ v4_group_1(X4)
      | ~ l1_group_1(X4)
      | ~ m1_group_2(X5,X4)
      | ~ m1_group_2(X6,X4)
      | r1_rlvect_1(X6,k2_group_1(X5)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t56_group_2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X2)
      | ~ l1_group_1(X2)
      | m1_subset_1(k2_group_1(X2),u1_struct_0(X2)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_group_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( k2_group_1(X1) = k2_group_1(X2)
    | v3_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X1,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X2)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X2)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r2_hidden(X3,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2))
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ r1_rlvect_1(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    v1_group_1(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( r1_rlvect_1(X1,k2_group_1(X2))
    | v3_struct_0(X3)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X1,X3)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X3)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X3)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k2_group_1(X1),u1_struct_0(X1))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    k2_group_1(esk1_0) = k2_group_1(esk2_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2_hidden(k2_group_1(esk1_0),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0))
    | ~ r1_rlvect_1(esk2_0,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_18]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1_rlvect_1(X1,k2_group_1(esk2_0))
    | ~ m1_group_2(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(k2_group_1(esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2_hidden(k2_group_1(esk2_0),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_12])]),c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRP641+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 00:35:43 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.05/4.25  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 2.05/4.25  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 2.05/4.25  # Preprocessing time       : 1.363 s
% 2.05/4.25  
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof found!
% 2.05/4.25  # SZS status Theorem
% 2.05/4.25  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object total steps             : 28
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object conjectures             : 16
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 13
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 2.05/4.25  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 24
% 2.05/4.25  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 2.05/4.25  # Parsed axioms                        : 36509
% 2.05/4.25  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 36408
% 2.05/4.25  # Initial clauses                      : 356
% 2.05/4.25  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 44
% 2.05/4.25  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 312
% 2.05/4.25  # Processed clauses                    : 1665
% 2.05/4.25  # ...of these trivial                  : 62
% 2.05/4.25  # ...subsumed                          : 713
% 2.05/4.25  # ...remaining for further processing  : 890
% 2.05/4.25  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.05/4.25  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.05/4.25  # Backward-subsumed                    : 18
% 2.05/4.25  # Backward-rewritten                   : 151
% 2.05/4.25  # Generated clauses                    : 7934
% 2.05/4.25  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 7616
% 2.05/4.25  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 510
% 2.05/4.25  # Paramodulations                      : 7928
% 2.05/4.25  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 2.05/4.25  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 2.05/4.25  # Current number of processed clauses  : 721
% 2.05/4.25  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 41
% 2.05/4.25  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.05/4.25  #    Negative unit clauses             : 14
% 2.05/4.25  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 666
% 2.05/4.25  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4899
% 2.05/4.25  # ...number of literals in the above   : 43916
% 2.05/4.25  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.05/4.25  # Current number of archived clauses   : 169
% 2.05/4.25  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 156371
% 2.05/4.25  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48788
% 2.05/4.25  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1208
% 2.05/4.25  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5685
% 2.05/4.25  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.05/4.25  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 2.05/4.25  # BW rewrite match successes           : 12
% 2.05/4.25  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.05/4.25  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.05/4.25  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1303314
% 2.05/4.25  
% 2.05/4.25  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.05/4.25  # User time                : 1.604 s
% 2.05/4.25  # System time              : 0.053 s
% 2.05/4.25  # Total time               : 1.657 s
% 2.05/4.25  # Maximum resident set size: 91724 pages
% 2.05/16.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.05/16.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.05/16.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.05/16.59  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------