TSTP Solution File: GRP639+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GRP639+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 08:39:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 10.54s 4.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  23 unt;   7 nHn;  38 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  101 (   6 equ;  58 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   15 (  13 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1368,plain,
    ( k2_funct_2(X1,X2,X3,X4) = k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ v1_funct_1(X3)
    | ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ v1_funct_2(X3,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1368) ).

cnf(i_0_1724,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_2(esk305_0,u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1724) ).

cnf(i_0_1725,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_1(esk305_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1725) ).

cnf(i_0_1387,plain,
    ( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1387) ).

cnf(i_0_1723,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk305_0,u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1723) ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_35) ).

cnf(i_0_837,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_837) ).

cnf(i_0_1721,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0),esk305_0,esk306_0),k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0),esk305_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk303_0,esk306_0)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1721) ).

cnf(i_0_2048,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1,X2),k9_relat_1(X1,X3))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_2048) ).

cnf(i_0_555,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(X3))
    | X3 != k5_group_4(X1,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X3)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_555) ).

cnf(i_0_759,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v1_group_1(k5_group_4(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_759) ).

cnf(i_0_758,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_group_2(k5_group_4(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_758) ).

cnf(i_0_1731,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk303_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1731) ).

cnf(i_0_1732,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk303_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1732) ).

cnf(i_0_1730,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk303_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1730) ).

cnf(i_0_1722,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk306_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk303_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1722) ).

cnf(i_0_1733,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk303_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zide13al/lgb.p',i_0_1733) ).

cnf(c_0_2066,plain,
    ( k2_funct_2(X1,X2,X3,X4) = k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ v1_funct_1(X3)
    | ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ v1_funct_2(X3,X1,X2) ),
    i_0_1368 ).

cnf(c_0_2067,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_2(esk305_0,u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0)),
    i_0_1724 ).

cnf(c_0_2068,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_1(esk305_0),
    i_0_1725 ).

cnf(c_0_2069,negated_conjecture,
    ( k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0),esk305_0,X1) = k9_relat_1(esk305_0,X1)
    | ~ m1_relset_1(esk305_0,u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2066,c_0_2067]),c_0_2068])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2070,plain,
    ( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_1387 ).

cnf(c_0_2071,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk305_0,u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0)),
    i_0_1723 ).

cnf(c_0_2072,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
    i_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_2073,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_837 ).

cnf(c_0_2074,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0),esk305_0,esk306_0),k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0),esk305_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk303_0,esk306_0)))),
    i_0_1721 ).

cnf(c_0_2075,plain,
    k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk303_0),u1_struct_0(esk304_0),esk305_0,X1) = k9_relat_1(esk305_0,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2069,c_0_2070]),c_0_2071])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2076,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2072,c_0_2073]) ).

cnf(c_0_2077,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(esk305_0,esk306_0),k9_relat_1(esk305_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk303_0,esk306_0)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2074,c_0_2075]),c_0_2075]) ).

cnf(c_0_2078,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1,X2),k9_relat_1(X1,X3))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X3) ),
    i_0_2048 ).

cnf(c_0_2079,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk305_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2076,c_0_2071]) ).

cnf(c_0_2080,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(X3))
    | X3 != k5_group_4(X1,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X3)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_555 ).

cnf(c_0_2081,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v1_group_1(k5_group_4(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_759 ).

cnf(c_0_2082,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_group_2(k5_group_4(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_758 ).

cnf(c_0_2083,plain,
    ~ r1_tarski(esk306_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk303_0,esk306_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2077,c_0_2078]),c_0_2079])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2084,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(X1,X2)))
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2080]),c_0_2081]),c_0_2082]) ).

cnf(c_0_2085,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk303_0),
    i_0_1731 ).

cnf(c_0_2086,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk303_0),
    i_0_1732 ).

cnf(c_0_2087,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk303_0),
    i_0_1730 ).

cnf(c_0_2088,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk306_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk303_0))),
    i_0_1722 ).

cnf(c_0_2089,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk303_0),
    i_0_1733 ).

cnf(c_0_2090,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2083,c_0_2084]),c_0_2085]),c_0_2086]),c_0_2087]),c_0_2088])]),c_0_2089]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRP639+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 20:30:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.68/0.92  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.68/0.92  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.68/0.92  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.68/0.92  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 10.54/4.52  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.54/4.52  # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.54/4.52  # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 10.54/4.52  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 10.54/4.52  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 10.54/4.52  #
% 10.54/4.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 10.54/4.52  
% 10.54/4.52  # Proof found!
% 10.54/4.52  # SZS status Theorem
% 10.54/4.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.54/4.52  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.54/4.52  
% 10.54/4.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.54/4.52  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 10.54/4.52  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 10.54/4.52  # Total time               : 0.037 s
% 10.54/4.52  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 10.54/4.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------