TSTP Solution File: GRP639+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GRP639+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 08:39:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 10.94s 4.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  23 unt;   7 nHn;  38 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  101 (   6 equ;  58 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   15 (  13 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1054,plain,
    ( k2_funct_2(X1,X2,X3,X4) = k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ v1_funct_1(X3)
    | ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ v1_funct_2(X3,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1054) ).

cnf(i_0_1364,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_2(esk256_0,u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1364) ).

cnf(i_0_1365,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_1(esk256_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1365) ).

cnf(i_0_1073,plain,
    ( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1073) ).

cnf(i_0_1363,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk256_0,u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1363) ).

cnf(i_0_18,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_714,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_714) ).

cnf(i_0_1361,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0),esk256_0,esk257_0),k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0),esk256_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk254_0,esk257_0)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1361) ).

cnf(i_0_1687,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1,X2),k9_relat_1(X1,X3))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1687) ).

cnf(i_0_452,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(X3))
    | X3 != k5_group_4(X1,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X3)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_452) ).

cnf(i_0_648,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v1_group_1(k5_group_4(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_648) ).

cnf(i_0_647,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_group_2(k5_group_4(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_647) ).

cnf(i_0_1371,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk254_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1371) ).

cnf(i_0_1372,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk254_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1372) ).

cnf(i_0_1370,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk254_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1370) ).

cnf(i_0_1362,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk257_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk254_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1362) ).

cnf(i_0_1373,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk254_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5mx2g16r/lgb.p',i_0_1373) ).

cnf(c_0_1705,plain,
    ( k2_funct_2(X1,X2,X3,X4) = k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ v1_funct_1(X3)
    | ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ v1_funct_2(X3,X1,X2) ),
    i_0_1054 ).

cnf(c_0_1706,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_2(esk256_0,u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0)),
    i_0_1364 ).

cnf(c_0_1707,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_1(esk256_0),
    i_0_1365 ).

cnf(c_0_1708,negated_conjecture,
    ( k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0),esk256_0,X1) = k9_relat_1(esk256_0,X1)
    | ~ m1_relset_1(esk256_0,u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1705,c_0_1706]),c_0_1707])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1709,plain,
    ( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_1073 ).

cnf(c_0_1710,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk256_0,u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0)),
    i_0_1363 ).

cnf(c_0_1711,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_1712,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_714 ).

cnf(c_0_1713,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0),esk256_0,esk257_0),k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0),esk256_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk254_0,esk257_0)))),
    i_0_1361 ).

cnf(c_0_1714,plain,
    k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk254_0),u1_struct_0(esk255_0),esk256_0,X1) = k9_relat_1(esk256_0,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1708,c_0_1709]),c_0_1710])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1715,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1711,c_0_1712]) ).

cnf(c_0_1716,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(esk256_0,esk257_0),k9_relat_1(esk256_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk254_0,esk257_0)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1713,c_0_1714]),c_0_1714]) ).

cnf(c_0_1717,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1,X2),k9_relat_1(X1,X3))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X3) ),
    i_0_1687 ).

cnf(c_0_1718,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk256_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1715,c_0_1710]) ).

cnf(c_0_1719,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(X3))
    | X3 != k5_group_4(X1,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X3)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_452 ).

cnf(c_0_1720,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v1_group_1(k5_group_4(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_648 ).

cnf(c_0_1721,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_group_2(k5_group_4(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_647 ).

cnf(c_0_1722,plain,
    ~ r1_tarski(esk257_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk254_0,esk257_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1716,c_0_1717]),c_0_1718])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1723,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(X1,X2)))
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_1719]),c_0_1720]),c_0_1721]) ).

cnf(c_0_1724,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk254_0),
    i_0_1371 ).

cnf(c_0_1725,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk254_0),
    i_0_1372 ).

cnf(c_0_1726,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk254_0),
    i_0_1370 ).

cnf(c_0_1727,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk257_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk254_0))),
    i_0_1362 ).

cnf(c_0_1728,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk254_0),
    i_0_1373 ).

cnf(c_0_1729,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1722,c_0_1723]),c_0_1724]),c_0_1725]),c_0_1726]),c_0_1727])]),c_0_1728]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : GRP639+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 11:57:50 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.47/0.70  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.70  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.47/0.70  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.47/0.70  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 10.94/4.10  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.94/4.10  # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.94/4.10  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.94/4.10  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 10.94/4.10  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 10.94/4.10  #
% 10.94/4.10  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 10.94/4.10  
% 10.94/4.10  # Proof found!
% 10.94/4.10  # SZS status Theorem
% 10.94/4.10  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.94/4.10  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.94/4.10  
% 10.94/4.10  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.94/4.10  # User time                : 0.031 s
% 10.94/4.10  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 10.94/4.10  # Total time               : 0.039 s
% 10.94/4.10  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 10.94/4.10  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------