TSTP Solution File: GRP629+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GRP629+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 08:39:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.63s 7.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (  16 unt;   9 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   86 (  15 equ;  57 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4357,negated_conjecture,
    k7_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk679_0),u1_struct_0(esk679_0),u1_struct_0(esk679_0),k6_autgroup(esk679_0,k3_group_1(esk679_0,esk680_0)),k6_autgroup(esk679_0,esk680_0)) != k6_autgroup(esk679_0,k2_group_1(esk679_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4357) ).

cnf(i_0_4127,plain,
    ( k7_funct_2(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X1),k6_autgroup(X1,X2),k6_autgroup(X1,X3)) = k6_autgroup(X1,k1_group_1(X1,X2,X3))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4127) ).

cnf(i_0_4361,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk679_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4361) ).

cnf(i_0_4360,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk679_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4360) ).

cnf(i_0_4362,negated_conjecture,
    v1_group_1(esk679_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4362) ).

cnf(i_0_4359,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk679_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4359) ).

cnf(i_0_4358,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk680_0,u1_struct_0(esk679_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4358) ).

cnf(i_0_4363,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk679_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4363) ).

cnf(i_0_4542,plain,
    ( k1_group_1(X1,X2,k3_group_1(X1,X3)) = k1_group_1(X1,k3_group_1(X1,X3),X2)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | k1_group_1(X1,X2,X3) != k1_group_1(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_4542) ).

cnf(i_0_874,plain,
    ( k1_group_1(X1,X2,X3) = k2_group_1(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | X3 != k3_group_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_874) ).

cnf(i_0_1084,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_subset_1(k3_group_1(X1,X2),u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bt3fgk6m/lgb.p',i_0_1084) ).

cnf(c_0_4554,negated_conjecture,
    k7_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk679_0),u1_struct_0(esk679_0),u1_struct_0(esk679_0),k6_autgroup(esk679_0,k3_group_1(esk679_0,esk680_0)),k6_autgroup(esk679_0,esk680_0)) != k6_autgroup(esk679_0,k2_group_1(esk679_0)),
    i_0_4357 ).

cnf(c_0_4555,plain,
    ( k7_funct_2(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X1),k6_autgroup(X1,X2),k6_autgroup(X1,X3)) = k6_autgroup(X1,k1_group_1(X1,X2,X3))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    i_0_4127 ).

cnf(c_0_4556,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk679_0),
    i_0_4361 ).

cnf(c_0_4557,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk679_0),
    i_0_4360 ).

cnf(c_0_4558,negated_conjecture,
    v1_group_1(esk679_0),
    i_0_4362 ).

cnf(c_0_4559,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk679_0),
    i_0_4359 ).

cnf(c_0_4560,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk680_0,u1_struct_0(esk679_0)),
    i_0_4358 ).

cnf(c_0_4561,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk679_0),
    i_0_4363 ).

cnf(c_0_4562,negated_conjecture,
    ( k6_autgroup(esk679_0,k1_group_1(esk679_0,k3_group_1(esk679_0,esk680_0),esk680_0)) != k6_autgroup(esk679_0,k2_group_1(esk679_0))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k3_group_1(esk679_0,esk680_0),u1_struct_0(esk679_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4554,c_0_4555]),c_0_4556]),c_0_4557]),c_0_4558]),c_0_4559]),c_0_4560])]),c_0_4561]) ).

cnf(c_0_4563,plain,
    ( k1_group_1(X1,X2,k3_group_1(X1,X3)) = k1_group_1(X1,k3_group_1(X1,X3),X2)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | k1_group_1(X1,X2,X3) != k1_group_1(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    i_0_4542 ).

cnf(c_0_4564,plain,
    ( k1_group_1(X1,X2,X3) = k2_group_1(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | X3 != k3_group_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    i_0_874 ).

cnf(c_0_4565,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_subset_1(k3_group_1(X1,X2),u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    i_0_1084 ).

cnf(c_0_4566,plain,
    ( k6_autgroup(esk679_0,k1_group_1(esk679_0,esk680_0,k3_group_1(esk679_0,esk680_0))) != k6_autgroup(esk679_0,k2_group_1(esk679_0))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k3_group_1(esk679_0,esk680_0),u1_struct_0(esk679_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4562,c_0_4563]),c_0_4556]),c_0_4557]),c_0_4559]),c_0_4560])]),c_0_4561]) ).

cnf(c_0_4567,plain,
    ( k1_group_1(X1,X2,k3_group_1(X1,X2)) = k2_group_1(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4564]),c_0_4565]) ).

cnf(c_0_4568,plain,
    ~ m1_subset_1(k3_group_1(esk679_0,esk680_0),u1_struct_0(esk679_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4566,c_0_4567]),c_0_4556]),c_0_4557]),c_0_4559]),c_0_4560])]),c_0_4561]) ).

cnf(c_0_4569,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4568,c_0_4565]),c_0_4556]),c_0_4557]),c_0_4559]),c_0_4560])]),c_0_4561]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : GRP629+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 05:24:03 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.40  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.35/1.54  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.35/1.54  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 1.35/1.54  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 1.35/1.54  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 13.63/7.54  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 13.63/7.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 13.63/7.54  # Trying AutoSched0 for 148 seconds
% 13.63/7.54  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 13.63/7.54  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 13.63/7.54  #
% 13.63/7.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.029 s
% 13.63/7.54  
% 13.63/7.54  # Proof found!
% 13.63/7.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 13.63/7.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.63/7.54  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.63/7.54  
% 13.63/7.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.63/7.54  # User time                : 0.064 s
% 13.63/7.54  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 13.63/7.54  # Total time               : 0.070 s
% 13.63/7.54  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 13.63/7.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------