TSTP Solution File: GRP616-1 by Twee---2.5.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.5.0
% Problem : GRP616-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 07:12:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GRP616-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : parallel-twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 11:57:08 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.39 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.40 Axiom 1 (multiply): multiply(X, Y) = inverse(double_divide(Y, X)).
% 0.18/0.40 Axiom 2 (single_axiom): double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X, inverse(Y))), Z)), double_divide(X, Z)) = Y.
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Lemma 3: double_divide(multiply(X, multiply(inverse(Y), Z)), double_divide(Z, X)) = Y.
% 0.18/0.40 Proof:
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(multiply(X, multiply(inverse(Y), Z)), double_divide(Z, X))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(multiply(X, inverse(double_divide(Z, inverse(Y)))), double_divide(Z, X))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Z, inverse(Y))), X)), double_divide(Z, X))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) }
% 0.18/0.40 Y
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Lemma 4: multiply(double_divide(X, Y), multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X))) = inverse(Z).
% 0.18/0.40 Proof:
% 0.18/0.40 multiply(double_divide(X, Y), multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X)))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.18/0.40 inverse(double_divide(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X)), double_divide(X, Y)))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 3 }
% 0.18/0.40 inverse(Z)
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Lemma 5: multiply(X, multiply(double_divide(Y, Z), multiply(inverse(W), multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(X), Y))))) = inverse(W).
% 0.18/0.40 Proof:
% 0.18/0.40 multiply(X, multiply(double_divide(Y, Z), multiply(inverse(W), multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(X), Y)))))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 3 R->L }
% 0.18/0.40 multiply(double_divide(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(X), Y)), double_divide(Y, Z)), multiply(double_divide(Y, Z), multiply(inverse(W), multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(X), Y)))))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.18/0.40 inverse(W)
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Lemma 6: multiply(X, multiply(inverse(Y), inverse(X))) = inverse(Y).
% 0.18/0.40 Proof:
% 0.18/0.40 multiply(X, multiply(inverse(Y), inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 3 R->L }
% 0.18/0.40 multiply(X, multiply(double_divide(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)), double_divide(W, Z)), inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.18/0.40 multiply(X, multiply(double_divide(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)), double_divide(W, Z)), multiply(inverse(Y), multiply(double_divide(W, Z), multiply(inverse(X), multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)))))))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.18/0.40 inverse(Y)
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Lemma 7: double_divide(multiply(X, Y), double_divide(inverse(Z), Z)) = double_divide(Y, X).
% 0.18/0.40 Proof:
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(multiply(X, Y), double_divide(inverse(Z), Z))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y, X)), double_divide(inverse(Z), Z))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(double_divide(Y, X)), inverse(Z))), double_divide(inverse(Z), Z))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 3 }
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(Y, X)
% 0.18/0.40
% 0.18/0.40 Lemma 8: double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), Y), double_divide(Y, inverse(Z)))) = Z.
% 0.18/0.40 Proof:
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), Y), double_divide(Y, inverse(Z))))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.18/0.40 double_divide(multiply(double_divide(Y, inverse(Z)), multiply(inverse(Z), multiply(inverse(X), Y))), double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), Y), double_divide(Y, inverse(Z))))
% 0.18/0.40 = { by lemma 3 }
% 0.18/0.41 Z
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Lemma 9: double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), Y)) = Y.
% 0.18/0.41 Proof:
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 3 R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)), double_divide(W, Z)), multiply(inverse(Y), multiply(double_divide(W, Z), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V)), multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)))))), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(W, Z), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V)), multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)))), double_divide(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)), double_divide(W, Z))))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 3 }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)), double_divide(W, Z)), multiply(inverse(Y), multiply(double_divide(W, Z), multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V)), multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)))))), double_divide(inverse(V), V))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(inverse(Y)), W)), double_divide(W, Z)), inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V))), double_divide(inverse(V), V))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 3 }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(inverse(Y), inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V))), double_divide(inverse(V), V))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(V, inverse(V)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(inverse(V), V), multiply(inverse(X), inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V)))), double_divide(multiply(V, inverse(V)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(inverse(V), V), inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V)), inverse(X)))), double_divide(multiply(V, inverse(V)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(inverse(V), V), multiply(V, multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V)), inverse(X))), inverse(V)))), double_divide(multiply(V, inverse(V)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V)), inverse(X))), double_divide(multiply(V, inverse(V)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), inverse(double_divide(inverse(V), V))), double_divide(multiply(V, inverse(V)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), multiply(V, inverse(V))), double_divide(multiply(V, inverse(V)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.18/0.41 Y
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Lemma 10: double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(inverse(Y)), inverse(X))) = Y.
% 0.18/0.41 Proof:
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(inverse(Y)), inverse(X)))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(X), double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), inverse(inverse(Y))), double_divide(inverse(inverse(Y)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.18/0.41 Y
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Lemma 11: inverse(inverse(X)) = X.
% 0.18/0.41 Proof:
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(inverse(X))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 double_divide(inverse(inverse(X)), double_divide(inverse(inverse(X)), inverse(inverse(X))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.18/0.41 X
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms_4): multiply(a, b) = multiply(b, a).
% 0.18/0.41 Proof:
% 0.18/0.41 multiply(a, b)
% 0.18/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(double_divide(b, a))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(double_divide(b, double_divide(inverse(inverse(b)), double_divide(inverse(inverse(a)), inverse(inverse(b))))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(double_divide(b, double_divide(b, double_divide(inverse(inverse(a)), inverse(inverse(b))))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(double_divide(b, double_divide(b, double_divide(a, inverse(inverse(b))))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(double_divide(b, double_divide(b, double_divide(a, b))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(double_divide(b, double_divide(inverse(inverse(b)), double_divide(a, b))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(double_divide(inverse(inverse(b)), double_divide(inverse(inverse(b)), double_divide(a, b))))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.18/0.41 inverse(double_divide(a, b))
% 0.18/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.18/0.41 multiply(b, a)
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------