TSTP Solution File: GRP613-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : GRP613-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:42:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  19 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))),X3)),double_divide(X1,X3)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z6tPWPtiEC/E---3.1_11988.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z6tPWPtiEC/E---3.1_11988.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z6tPWPtiEC/E---3.1_11988.p',multiply) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))),X3)),double_divide(X1,X3)) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))),X3)),inverse(X4))),double_divide(X1,X3))),X2) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X2))),X1) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),double_divide(inverse(X2),X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(X1))),double_divide(X2,inverse(X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),X1)),inverse(X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),double_divide(inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),X1)),X2) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(inverse(X2),X2)) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    prove_these_axioms_1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),double_divide(X2,inverse(X1))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) != inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))) = double_divide(inverse(X1),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_5]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),X1) = double_divide(inverse(X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem    : GRP613-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:06:54 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z6tPWPtiEC/E---3.1_11988.p
% 0.23/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 12066 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.23/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.53  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12070 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.23/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.53  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.53  
% 0.23/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.53  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.23/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.23/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.23/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.23/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 26
% 0.23/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 7
% 0.23/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 19
% 0.23/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.23/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 270
% 0.23/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 196
% 0.23/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 270
% 0.23/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 187
% 0.23/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 12
% 0.23/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.23/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 172
% 0.23/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 172
% 0.23/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.23/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.23/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 50
% 0.23/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 0.23/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3227
% 0.23/0.53  
% 0.23/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.53  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.53  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1556 pages
% 0.23/0.53  
% 0.23/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.53  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 0.23/0.53  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Total time               : 0.031 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.23/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------