TSTP Solution File: GRP602-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GRP602-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:49:34 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  33 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  32 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   70 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X3))))),X3)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hdlUzzfKKT/E---3.1_11978.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hdlUzzfKKT/E---3.1_11978.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hdlUzzfKKT/E---3.1_11978.p',multiply) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X3))))),X3)) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,double_divide(X3,X4)))))) = inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X3,X2)),X4)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),X3)),double_divide(X1,X3))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),double_divide(X2,X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X3,X1)),X4)),X2))) = double_divide(X3,X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),double_divide(X2,double_divide(X2,inverse(double_divide(X3,X1)))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))),inverse(double_divide(X3,X2))) = double_divide(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X2),double_divide(X1,X3)))) = inverse(double_divide(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X2,X3)),X1))) = double_divide(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X3,inverse(double_divide(X1,double_divide(X3,X4))))),X2))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    prove_these_axioms_2 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))),X1)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))) != a2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))) = double_divide(X2,inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),X1) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),X2)) = double_divide(inverse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    double_divide(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2)),inverse(a2)) != a2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    double_divide(X1,X2) = double_divide(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,double_divide(X3,X4)))))) = double_divide(inverse(X4),double_divide(X3,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    double_divide(inverse(a2),double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))) != a2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)) = double_divide(X2,inverse(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_22]),c_0_14]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    double_divide(inverse(a2),double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))) != a2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_14]),c_0_19])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : GRP602-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:34:20 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hdlUzzfKKT/E---3.1_11978.p
% 0.20/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # new_bool_3 with pid 12063 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12068 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.20/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 54
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.20/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 8
% 0.20/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 38
% 0.20/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 19
% 0.20/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 900
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 838
% 0.20/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 900
% 0.20/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 429
% 0.20/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 15
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.20/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 752
% 0.20/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 752
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 23
% 0.20/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.20/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 129
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 56
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9715
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1612 pages
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.20/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------