TSTP Solution File: GRP600-1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : GRP600-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 00:21:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  22 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   3   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    double_divide: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    b: $i ).

cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X3),X2))))) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_4,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_4) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X3),X2))))) = X3,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X3),inverse(double_divide(inverse(X4),inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),X3))))))))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X2),inverse(X1)))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X1),X2),inverse(double_divide(inverse(X3),X2))),inverse(X3)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2)),inverse(X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(X2)))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),X2) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X1),X2),inverse(X1)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),X2)) = double_divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_5]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
    prove_these_axioms_4 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_14]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(double_divide(b,a)) != inverse(double_divide(a,b)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    double_divide(X1,X2) = double_divide(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : GRP600-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 21:16:25 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.58/0.61  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.60/0.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.62  % Proof found
% 0.60/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.62  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.62  % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.60/0.62  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.60/0.62  % Total time : 0.008000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------