TSTP Solution File: GRP598-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GRP598-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:49:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 15 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X3),X2))))) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2KxUjEH7hb/E---3.1_12337.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2KxUjEH7hb/E---3.1_12337.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2KxUjEH7hb/E---3.1_12337.p',multiply) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X3),X2))))) = X3,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X3),inverse(double_divide(inverse(X4),inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),X3))))))))) = X4,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X2),inverse(X1)))) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]),c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(X2)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X1),X2),inverse(double_divide(inverse(X3),X2))),inverse(X3)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2)),inverse(X2)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
prove_these_axioms_2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(X2)))) = inverse(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))) != a2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : GRP598-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:28:43 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2KxUjEH7hb/E---3.1_12337.p
% 0.15/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # new_bool_1 with pid 12416 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12420 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.15/0.41 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.15/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.15/0.41 # Generated clauses : 112
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 107
% 0.15/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Paramodulations : 112
% 0.15/0.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 39
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 94
% 0.15/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 94
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1463
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1424 pages
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.15/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------