TSTP Solution File: GRP595-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : GRP595-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:57:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.71s 1.94s
% Output   : Refutation 1.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;   2 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (  20 equ;   1 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('GRP595-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(A,B),inverse(double_divide(A,inverse(double_divide(C,B)))))) = C,
    file('GRP595-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    multiply(A,B) = inverse(double_divide(B,A)),
    file('GRP595-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(A,B)) = multiply(B,A),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[5])]),
    [iquote('copy,5,flip.1')] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    multiply(multiply(multiply(A,B),C),double_divide(C,A)) = B,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[3]),7,7,7]),
    [iquote('back_demod,3,demod,7,7,7')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    multiply(multiply(A,B),double_divide(B,multiply(multiply(C,A),D))) = double_divide(D,C),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,8]),
    [iquote('para_into,8.1.1.1.1,8.1.1')] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    multiply(A,double_divide(double_divide(B,C),multiply(C,A))) = B,
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,8]),
    [iquote('para_into,8.1.1.1,8.1.1')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    double_divide(multiply(A,double_divide(B,multiply(C,A))),C) = B,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,12])]),
    [iquote('para_into,10.1.1,12.1.1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(65,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(multiply(A,B),C),multiply(C,A)) = B,
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[35,10]),
    [iquote('para_into,35.1.1.1,10.1.1')] ).

cnf(76,plain,
    inverse(A) = multiply(B,multiply(C,double_divide(A,multiply(B,C)))),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[35,7]),
    [iquote('para_from,35.1.1,6.1.1.1')] ).

cnf(78,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,double_divide(C,multiply(A,B)))) = inverse(C),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[76])]),
    [iquote('copy,76,flip.1')] ).

cnf(102,plain,
    inverse(A) = multiply(multiply(B,C),double_divide(multiply(C,A),B)),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[65,7]),
    [iquote('para_from,65.1.1,6.1.1.1')] ).

cnf(103,plain,
    multiply(multiply(A,B),double_divide(multiply(B,C),A)) = inverse(C),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[102])]),
    [iquote('copy,102,flip.1')] ).

cnf(210,plain,
    multiply(inverse(A),double_divide(double_divide(multiply(B,A),C),C)) = B,
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[103,8]),
    [iquote('para_from,103.1.1,8.1.1.1')] ).

cnf(241,plain,
    double_divide(multiply(A,B),multiply(C,inverse(B))) = double_divide(A,C),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[210,35])]),
    [iquote('para_from,210.1.1,35.1.1.1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(356,plain,
    double_divide(multiply(inverse(A),double_divide(B,C)),C) = multiply(B,A),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[241,35]),
    [iquote('para_from,241.1.1,35.1.1.1.2')] ).

cnf(409,plain,
    multiply(double_divide(multiply(A,B),C),B) = double_divide(A,C),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[356,210])]),
    [iquote('para_into,356.1.1.1,210.1.1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(451,plain,
    multiply(A,double_divide(A,multiply(B,C))) = double_divide(C,B),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[409,35]),
    [iquote('para_into,409.1.1.1,35.1.1')] ).

cnf(592,plain,
    multiply(A,double_divide(B,A)) = inverse(B),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[451,78]),
    [iquote('para_from,451.1.1,78.1.1.2')] ).

cnf(994,plain,
    multiply(multiply(A,B),C) = multiply(A,multiply(B,C)),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[592,65]),7]),
    [iquote('para_into,592.1.1.2,65.1.1,demod,7')] ).

cnf(996,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[994,1]),
    [iquote('binary,994.1,1.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GRP595-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 05:06:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.71/1.94  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.71/1.94  The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 1.71/1.94  Wed Jul 27 05:06:16 2022
% 1.71/1.94  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 20204.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.71/1.94  set(auto).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.71/1.94  clear(print_given).
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  list(usable).
% 1.71/1.94  0 [] A=A.
% 1.71/1.94  0 [] inverse(double_divide(double_divide(A,B),inverse(double_divide(A,inverse(double_divide(C,B))))))=C.
% 1.71/1.94  0 [] multiply(A,B)=inverse(double_divide(B,A)).
% 1.71/1.94  0 [] multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)!=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)).
% 1.71/1.94  end_of_list.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.71/1.94  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.71/1.94     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  ------------> process usable:
% 1.71/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 1 [] multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)!=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)).
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  ------------> process sos:
% 1.71/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] A=A.
% 1.71/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 3 [] inverse(double_divide(double_divide(A,B),inverse(double_divide(A,inverse(double_divide(C,B))))))=C.
% 1.71/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 4 [new_demod,3] inverse(double_divide(double_divide(A,B),inverse(double_divide(A,inverse(double_divide(C,B))))))=C.
% 1.71/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 6 [copy,5,flip.1] inverse(double_divide(A,B))=multiply(B,A).
% 1.71/1.94  ---> New Demodulator: 7 [new_demod,6] inverse(double_divide(A,B))=multiply(B,A).
% 1.71/1.94    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.71/1.94  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 4.
% 1.71/1.94  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 7.
% 1.71/1.94      >> back demodulating 3 with 7.
% 1.71/1.94  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 9.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  sos_size=290
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.02 sec ----> 996 [binary,994.1,1.1] $F.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  Length of proof is 17.  Level of proof is 14.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.71/1.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.71/1.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.71/1.94  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  ============ end of search ============
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.71/1.94  clauses given                 37
% 1.71/1.94  clauses generated            902
% 1.71/1.94  clauses kept                 699
% 1.71/1.94  clauses forward subsumed     626
% 1.71/1.94  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.71/1.94  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 1.71/1.94  
% 1.71/1.94  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.71/1.94  user CPU time          0.02          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.77/1.94  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.77/1.94  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.77/1.94  
% 1.77/1.94  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.77/1.94  
% 1.77/1.94  Process 20204 finished Wed Jul 27 05:06:17 2022
% 1.77/1.94  Otter interrupted
% 1.77/1.94  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------