TSTP Solution File: GRP589-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : GRP589-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 12:07:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 35 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f111,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f3,f103]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
! [X0,X1] : multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = multiply(inverse(X0),X0),
inference(superposition,[],[f79,f60]) ).
fof(f60,plain,
! [X0,X1] : double_divide(inverse(multiply(inverse(X0),X0)),inverse(X1)) = X1,
inference(superposition,[],[f40,f53]) ).
fof(f53,plain,
! [X0,X1] : inverse(X1) = multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(inverse(X0),X0)),
inference(superposition,[],[f2,f40]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : multiply(X0,X1) = inverse(double_divide(X1,X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).
fof(f40,plain,
! [X0,X1] : double_divide(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),inverse(X0)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[],[f7,f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : inverse(X0) = multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(inverse(X0),X1),double_divide(X1,X2))),
inference(superposition,[],[f2,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : double_divide(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X0),double_divide(X0,X1)),X1) = X2,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f4,f2]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : double_divide(multiply(inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(X2))),double_divide(X0,X1)),X1) = X2,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f1,f2]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(X2))))),X1) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : double_divide(multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),multiply(multiply(inverse(X0),X1),double_divide(X1,X2))),X0),X2) = X3,
inference(superposition,[],[f5,f5]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
! [X0,X1] : double_divide(inverse(X0),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1))) = X0,
inference(superposition,[],[f75,f53]) ).
fof(f75,plain,
! [X2,X1] : double_divide(multiply(inverse(X2),X1),inverse(X1)) = X2,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f71,f56]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
! [X0,X1] : inverse(X1) = multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(inverse(X0),X0))),
inference(superposition,[],[f53,f53]) ).
fof(f71,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : double_divide(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(X0),X0))),X1),inverse(X1)) = X2,
inference(superposition,[],[f5,f60]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GRP589-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 03:56:48 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 % (14250)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.12/0.36 % (14253)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.37 % (14254)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.37 % (14256)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.37 % (14252)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.37 % (14253)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.37 % (14255)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.12/0.37 TRYING [2]
% 0.12/0.37 % (14251)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.37 TRYING [3]
% 0.12/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.12/0.37 TRYING [2]
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.37 TRYING [4]
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)Memory used [KB]: 841
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.37 % (14257)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.37 % (14250)Success in time 0.022 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------