TSTP Solution File: GRP587-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : GRP587-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:42:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  25 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (  24 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(X3))),X2))) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ua0lgcsenx/E---3.1_18559.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ua0lgcsenx/E---3.1_18559.p',multiply) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ua0lgcsenx/E---3.1_18559.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(X3))),X2))) = X3,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    double_divide(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X3),double_divide(X1,X2)))) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    double_divide(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X3),double_divide(X1,X2))),multiply(inverse(X4),X3))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X2),double_divide(X3,X1))),X3) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    double_divide(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),inverse(X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(inverse(X2),X1)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X2))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(inverse(X2))) = multiply(inverse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X2,X3))) = multiply(multiply(X2,X3),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,X3),double_divide(X4,X1))),X4) = multiply(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),X1) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(multiply(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    prove_these_axioms_3 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X3,multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b3,multiply(a3,c3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem    : GRP587-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:56:21 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ua0lgcsenx/E---3.1_18559.p
% 0.23/0.54  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # new_bool_3 with pid 18638 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.54  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 18642 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.54  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.54  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.54  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.23/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.23/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.23/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 148
% 0.23/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 46
% 0.23/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 35
% 0.23/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 67
% 0.23/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 44
% 0.23/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 1533
% 0.23/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1227
% 0.23/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 1533
% 0.23/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 848
% 0.23/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.23/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.23/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.23/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1032
% 0.23/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1032
% 0.23/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 47
% 0.23/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.23/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 210
% 0.23/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 180
% 0.23/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 12501
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54  # User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.23/0.54  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1612 pages
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54  # User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.23/0.54  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.23/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.23/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------