TSTP Solution File: GRP581-1 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : GRP581-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:56:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.93s 1.15s
% Output : Proof 0.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GRP581-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 04:33:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.93/1.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.93/1.15 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.93/1.15 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(A, double_divide(double_divide(identity, B), double_divide(C, double_divide(B, A)))), double_divide(identity, identity)) = C
% 0.93/1.15 multiply(A, B) = double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity)
% 0.93/1.15 inverse(A) = double_divide(A, identity)
% 0.93/1.15 identity = double_divide(A, inverse(A))
% 0.93/1.15 multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = identity ==> \bottom
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 This holds because
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 E:
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(A, double_divide(double_divide(identity, B), double_divide(C, double_divide(B, A)))), double_divide(identity, identity)) = C
% 0.93/1.15 f1(identity) = false__
% 0.93/1.15 f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) = true__
% 0.93/1.15 identity = double_divide(A, inverse(A))
% 0.93/1.15 inverse(A) = double_divide(A, identity)
% 0.93/1.15 multiply(A, B) = double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity)
% 0.93/1.15 G:
% 0.93/1.15 true__ = false__
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 This holds because
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(identity), X2)), inverse(identity)) = double_divide(X0, double_divide(double_divide(identity, X1), double_divide(X2, double_divide(X1, X0))))
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(A, identity) -> inverse(A)
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(A, inverse(A)) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(A, double_divide(double_divide(identity, B), double_divide(C, double_divide(B, A)))), double_divide(identity, identity)) -> C
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(Y0, double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y1), double_divide(Y2, double_divide(Y1, Y0)))), inverse(identity)) -> Y2
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(Y0, double_divide(identity, double_divide(Y2, double_divide(inverse(identity), Y0)))), inverse(identity)) -> Y2
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(Y0, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(Y2, double_divide(identity, Y0)))), inverse(identity)) -> Y2
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y1), double_divide(Y2, inverse(Y1)))), inverse(identity)) -> Y2
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, double_divide(Y1, inverse(inverse(identity))))), inverse(identity)) -> Y1
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, Y0))), inverse(identity)) -> Y0
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))), inverse(identity)) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(inverse(Y1), double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y1), inverse(Y2))), inverse(identity)) -> Y2
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(X1, inverse(identity)))), X1), inverse(identity)) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(inverse(identity), inverse(Y1))), inverse(identity)) -> Y1
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(inverse(inverse(double_divide(identity, X0))), X0), inverse(identity)) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(double_divide(inverse(inverse(identity)), double_divide(identity, inverse(Y1))), inverse(identity)) -> Y1
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(false__, double_divide(double_divide(identity, false__), double_divide(X0, double_divide(false__, false__)))) -> double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, X0)))
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(false__, double_divide(double_divide(identity, false__), double_divide(double_divide(Y1, inverse(identity)), double_divide(false__, false__)))) -> Y1
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(false__, double_divide(double_divide(identity, false__), double_divide(double_divide(identity, X0), double_divide(false__, false__)))) -> inverse(inverse(X0))
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(false__, double_divide(double_divide(identity, false__), double_divide(identity, double_divide(false__, false__)))) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(identity, Y0) -> inverse(inverse(inverse(Y0)))
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(Y0)))) -> Y0
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 double_divide(inverse(inverse(Y0)), inverse(identity)) -> double_divide(identity, Y0)
% 0.93/1.15 f1(identity) -> false__
% 0.93/1.15 f1(inverse(identity)) -> true__
% 0.93/1.15 f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) -> true__
% 0.93/1.15 inverse(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(Y0)))) -> Y0
% 0.93/1.15 inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, Y0)))) -> Y0
% 0.93/1.15 inverse(double_divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(double_divide(identity, Y0)))) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 inverse(double_divide(inverse(inverse(double_divide(identity, Y0))), Y0)) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 inverse(identity) -> identity
% 0.93/1.15 multiply(A, B) -> double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity)
% 0.93/1.15 true__ -> false__
% 0.93/1.15 with the LPO induced by
% 0.93/1.15 a1 > f1 > multiply > double_divide > inverse > identity > true__ > false__
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.93/1.15
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------