TSTP Solution File: GRP573-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP573-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:41:33 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.32s 1.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  22 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   3   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (;  24   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > double_divide > #nlpp > inverse > identity > a1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a1,type,
    a1: $i ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(double_divide,type,
    double_divide: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(identity,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( inverse(A) = double_divide(A,identity) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_29,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( identity = double_divide(A,inverse(A)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_25,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( multiply(A,B) = double_divide(double_divide(B,A),identity) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_31,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_23,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : ( double_divide(double_divide(A,double_divide(double_divide(B,double_divide(C,A)),double_divide(C,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = B ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_6] : ( double_divide(A_6,identity) = inverse(A_6) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [A_7] : ( double_divide(A_7,inverse(A_7)) = identity ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [B_10,A_11] : ( double_divide(double_divide(B_10,A_11),identity) = multiply(A_11,B_10) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [A_7] : ( multiply(inverse(A_7),A_7) = double_divide(identity,identity) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_28]) ).

tff(c_57,plain,
    ! [A_7] : ( multiply(inverse(A_7),A_7) = inverse(identity) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_52]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    inverse(identity) != identity,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_57,c_10]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2,C_3] : ( double_divide(double_divide(A_1,double_divide(double_divide(B_2,double_divide(C_3,A_1)),double_divide(C_3,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = B_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).

tff(c_66,plain,
    ! [A_13,B_14,C_15] : ( double_divide(double_divide(A_13,double_divide(double_divide(B_14,double_divide(C_15,A_13)),inverse(C_15))),inverse(identity)) = B_14 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_6,c_2]) ).

tff(c_553,plain,
    ! [B_33,A_34] : ( double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(B_33,inverse(A_34)),inverse(A_34))),inverse(identity)) = B_33 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_66]) ).

tff(c_618,plain,
    ! [A_35] : ( double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(identity,inverse(A_35))),inverse(identity)) = A_35 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_553]) ).

tff(c_658,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(identity,identity),inverse(identity)) = identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_618]) ).

tff(c_663,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(identity),inverse(identity)) = identity,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_658]) ).

tff(c_87,plain,
    ! [B_14,A_6] : ( double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(B_14,inverse(A_6)),inverse(A_6))),inverse(identity)) = B_14 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_66]) ).

tff(c_754,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(identity,inverse(identity))),inverse(identity)) = inverse(identity),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_663,c_87]) ).

tff(c_778,plain,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_663,c_6,c_8,c_754]) ).

tff(c_780,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_778]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GRP573-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:41:23 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.32/1.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.32/1.97  
% 3.32/1.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.32/2.00  
% 3.32/2.00  Inference rules
% 3.32/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.32/2.00  #Ref     : 0
% 3.32/2.00  #Sup     : 205
% 3.32/2.00  #Fact    : 0
% 3.32/2.00  #Define  : 0
% 3.32/2.00  #Split   : 0
% 3.32/2.00  #Chain   : 0
% 3.32/2.00  #Close   : 0
% 3.32/2.00  
% 3.32/2.00  Ordering : KBO
% 3.32/2.00  
% 3.32/2.00  Simplification rules
% 3.32/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.32/2.00  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.32/2.00  #Demod        : 163
% 3.32/2.00  #Tautology    : 106
% 3.32/2.00  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.32/2.00  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.32/2.00  
% 3.32/2.00  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.32/2.00  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.32/2.00  
% 3.32/2.00  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.32/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.32/2.00  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 3.32/2.00  Parsing              : 0.23
% 3.32/2.00  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.32/2.00  Main loop            : 0.44
% 3.32/2.00  Inferencing          : 0.17
% 3.32/2.00  Reduction            : 0.15
% 3.32/2.00  Demodulation         : 0.11
% 3.32/2.00  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.32/2.00  Subsumption          : 0.07
% 3.32/2.00  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.32/2.00  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.32/2.00  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.32/2.01  Total                : 0.92
% 3.32/2.01  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.32/2.01  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.32/2.01  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.32/2.01  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------