TSTP Solution File: GRP569-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : GRP569-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:57:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.51s 1.70s
% Output   : Refutation 1.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (  10 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
    file('GRP569-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    double_divide(double_divide(A,double_divide(double_divide(B,double_divide(A,C)),double_divide(C,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = B,
    file('GRP569-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    multiply(A,B) = double_divide(double_divide(B,A),identity),
    file('GRP569-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    inverse(A) = double_divide(A,identity),
    file('GRP569-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    identity = double_divide(A,inverse(A)),
    file('GRP569-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    double_divide(A,double_divide(A,identity)) = identity,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[9]),8])]),
    [iquote('copy,9,demod,8,flip.1')] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    double_divide(identity,identity) != identity,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[1]),8,6,11]),
    [iquote('back_demod,1,demod,8,6,11')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(A,identity),double_divide(identity,identity)) = A,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,11]),11]),
    [iquote('para_into,3.1.1.1.2.1,10.1.1,demod,11')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(A,double_divide(identity,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = double_divide(A,identity),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,3]),
    [iquote('para_from,17.1.1,3.1.1.1.2.1')] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    double_divide(identity,identity) = identity,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[21,11]),18])]),
    [iquote('para_into,21.1.1.1.2,10.1.1,demod,18,flip.1')] ).

cnf(32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[30,12]),
    [iquote('binary,30.1,12.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRP569-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 05:11:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.51/1.70  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.51/1.70  The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 1.51/1.70  Wed Jul 27 05:11:35 2022
% 1.51/1.70  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 25482.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.51/1.70  set(auto).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.51/1.70  clear(print_given).
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  list(usable).
% 1.51/1.70  0 [] A=A.
% 1.51/1.70  0 [] double_divide(double_divide(A,double_divide(double_divide(B,double_divide(A,C)),double_divide(C,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity))=B.
% 1.51/1.70  0 [] multiply(A,B)=double_divide(double_divide(B,A),identity).
% 1.51/1.70  0 [] inverse(A)=double_divide(A,identity).
% 1.51/1.70  0 [] identity=double_divide(A,inverse(A)).
% 1.51/1.70  0 [] multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=identity.
% 1.51/1.70  end_of_list.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.51/1.70  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.51/1.70     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  ------------> process usable:
% 1.51/1.70  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=identity.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  ------------> process sos:
% 1.51/1.70  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] A=A.
% 1.51/1.70  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 3 [] double_divide(double_divide(A,double_divide(double_divide(B,double_divide(A,C)),double_divide(C,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity))=B.
% 1.51/1.70  ---> New Demodulator: 4 [new_demod,3] double_divide(double_divide(A,double_divide(double_divide(B,double_divide(A,C)),double_divide(C,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity))=B.
% 1.51/1.70  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 5 [] multiply(A,B)=double_divide(double_divide(B,A),identity).
% 1.51/1.70  ---> New Demodulator: 6 [new_demod,5] multiply(A,B)=double_divide(double_divide(B,A),identity).
% 1.51/1.70  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 7 [] inverse(A)=double_divide(A,identity).
% 1.51/1.70  ---> New Demodulator: 8 [new_demod,7] inverse(A)=double_divide(A,identity).
% 1.51/1.70  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 10 [copy,9,demod,8,flip.1] double_divide(A,double_divide(A,identity))=identity.
% 1.51/1.70  ---> New Demodulator: 11 [new_demod,10] double_divide(A,double_divide(A,identity))=identity.
% 1.51/1.70    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.51/1.70  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 4.
% 1.51/1.70  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 6.
% 1.51/1.70      >> back demodulating 1 with 6.
% 1.51/1.70  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 8.
% 1.51/1.70  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 11.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 32 [binary,30.1,12.1] $F.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.51/1.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.51/1.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.51/1.70  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  ============ end of search ============
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.51/1.70  clauses given                  8
% 1.51/1.70  clauses generated             21
% 1.51/1.70  clauses kept                  18
% 1.51/1.70  clauses forward subsumed      17
% 1.51/1.70  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.51/1.70  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.51/1.70  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.51/1.70  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.51/1.70  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.51/1.70  
% 1.51/1.70  Process 25482 finished Wed Jul 27 05:11:37 2022
% 1.51/1.70  Otter interrupted
% 1.51/1.70  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------