TSTP Solution File: GRP569-1 by Moca---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : GRP569-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:56:20 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.79s 3.87s
% Output   : Proof 3.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRP569-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 18:05:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.79/3.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.79/3.87  % SZS output start Proof
% 3.79/3.87  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  	double_divide(double_divide(A, double_divide(double_divide(B, double_divide(A, C)), double_divide(C, identity))), double_divide(identity, identity)) = B
% 3.79/3.87  	multiply(A, B) = double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity)
% 3.79/3.87  	inverse(A) = double_divide(A, identity)
% 3.79/3.87  	identity = double_divide(A, inverse(A))
% 3.79/3.87  	multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = identity ==> \bottom
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  This holds because
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  E:
% 3.79/3.87  	double_divide(double_divide(A, double_divide(double_divide(B, double_divide(A, C)), double_divide(C, identity))), double_divide(identity, identity)) = B
% 3.79/3.87  	f1(identity) = false__
% 3.79/3.87  	f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) = true__
% 3.79/3.87  	identity = double_divide(A, inverse(A))
% 3.79/3.87  	inverse(A) = double_divide(A, identity)
% 3.79/3.87  	multiply(A, B) = double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity)
% 3.79/3.87  G:
% 3.79/3.87  	true__ = false__
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  This holds because
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  	double_divide(A, inverse(A)) -> identity
% 3.79/3.87  	double_divide(double_divide(A, double_divide(double_divide(B, double_divide(A, C)), double_divide(C, identity))), double_divide(identity, identity)) -> B
% 3.79/3.87  	double_divide(double_divide(Y0, double_divide(inverse(Y1), inverse(inverse(Y0)))), inverse(identity)) -> Y1
% 3.79/3.87  	double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(X0, double_divide(identity, identity))), double_divide(identity, identity)) -> double_divide(X0, identity)
% 3.79/3.87  	double_divide(identity, identity) -> identity
% 3.79/3.87  	double_divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(identity)) -> Y0
% 3.79/3.87  	f1(identity) -> false__
% 3.79/3.87  	f1(inverse(identity)) -> true__
% 3.79/3.87  	f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) -> true__
% 3.79/3.87  	inverse(A) -> double_divide(A, identity)
% 3.79/3.87  	inverse(identity) -> identity
% 3.79/3.87  	inverse(inverse(X0)) -> double_divide(double_divide(identity, X0), double_divide(identity, identity))
% 3.79/3.87  	multiply(A, B) -> double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity)
% 3.79/3.87  	true__ -> false__
% 3.79/3.87  with the LPO induced by
% 3.79/3.87  	a1 > multiply > inverse > double_divide > f1 > identity > true__ > false__
% 3.79/3.87  
% 3.79/3.87  % SZS output end Proof
% 3.79/3.87  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------