TSTP Solution File: GRP569-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GRP569-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:49:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Timeout 408.33s 300.11s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (  20 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LRID60Bw2S/E---3.1_29232.p',multiply) ).

cnf(inverse,axiom,
    inverse(X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LRID60Bw2S/E---3.1_29232.p',inverse) ).

cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X3)),double_divide(X3,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LRID60Bw2S/E---3.1_29232.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(identity,axiom,
    identity = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LRID60Bw2S/E---3.1_29232.p',identity) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LRID60Bw2S/E---3.1_29232.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    inverse(X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
    inverse ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X3)),double_divide(X3,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X3)),inverse(X3))),inverse(identity)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    identity = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
    identity ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = multiply(identity,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(inverse(X2),multiply(identity,X1))),inverse(identity)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_6]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),multiply(identity,X1)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(X2,inverse(X1)),inverse(identity))),inverse(identity)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(identity)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
    prove_these_axioms_1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = inverse(identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(X1,inverse(identity))),inverse(identity)) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(identity) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_10]),c_0_6]),c_0_15]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : GRP569-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:27:44 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LRID60Bw2S/E---3.1_29232.p
% 408.33/300.11  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 408.33/300.11  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.33/300.11  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # new_bool_1 with pid 29351 completed with status 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 408.33/300.11  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.33/300.11  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.33/300.11  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 408.33/300.11  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with pid 29353 completed with status 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S
% 408.33/300.11  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.33/300.11  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.33/300.11  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 408.33/300.11  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.33/300.11  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 408.33/300.11  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 408.33/300.11  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 408.33/300.11  
% 408.33/300.11  # Proof found!
% 408.33/300.11  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 408.33/300.11  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 408.33/300.11  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 408.33/300.11  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Initial clauses                      : 5
% 408.33/300.11  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 408.33/300.11  # Processed clauses                    : 45
% 408.33/300.11  # ...of these trivial                  : 16
% 408.33/300.11  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # ...remaining for further processing  : 29
% 408.33/300.11  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 408.33/300.11  # Generated clauses                    : 141
% 408.33/300.11  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 88
% 408.33/300.11  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Paramodulations                      : 141
% 408.33/300.11  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # NegExts                              : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Total rewrite steps                  : 166
% 408.33/300.11  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 408.33/300.11  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 408.33/300.11  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 408.33/300.11  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 408.33/300.11  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 408.33/300.11  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 408.33/300.11  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 408.33/300.11  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 408.33/300.11  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 408.33/300.11  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 408.33/300.11  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 408.33/300.11  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 408.33/300.11  # Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 408.33/300.11  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 408.33/300.11  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 408.33/300.11  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 408.33/300.11  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
% 408.33/300.11  # ...number of literals in the above   : 35
% 408.33/300.11  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 408.33/300.11  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 408.33/300.11  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 408.33/300.11  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 408.33/300.11  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1640
% 408.33/300.11  
% 408.33/300.11  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.33/300.11  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 408.33/300.11  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 408.33/300.11  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 408.33/300.11  # Maximum resident set size: 1428 pages
% 408.33/300.11  
% 408.33/300.11  # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.33/300.11  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 408.33/300.11  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 408.33/300.11  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 408.33/300.11  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 408.33/300.11  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------