TSTP Solution File: GRP564-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP564-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:41:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.08s 2.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  24 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   3   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (;  57   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > divide > #nlpp > inverse > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(divide,type,
    divide: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( multiply(A,B) = divide(A,inverse(B)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_24,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : ( divide(divide(divide(A,inverse(B)),C),divide(A,C)) = B ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5] : ( divide(A_4,inverse(B_5)) = multiply(A_4,B_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2,C_3] : ( divide(divide(divide(A_1,inverse(B_2)),C_3),divide(A_1,C_3)) = B_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_24]) ).

tff(c_7,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2,C_3] : ( divide(divide(multiply(A_1,B_2),C_3),divide(A_1,C_3)) = B_2 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_2]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_9,C_10] : ( divide(divide(multiply(A_8,B_9),C_10),divide(A_8,C_10)) = B_9 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_2]) ).

tff(c_57,plain,
    ! [A_14,B_15,C_16,B_17] : ( divide(divide(multiply(divide(multiply(A_14,B_15),C_16),B_17),divide(A_14,C_16)),B_15) = B_17 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_7,c_17]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    ! [A_25,B_26,C_27,B_28] : ( multiply(divide(multiply(divide(multiply(A_25,inverse(B_26)),C_27),B_28),divide(A_25,C_27)),B_26) = B_28 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_57]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2,C_3,B_9] : ( divide(divide(multiply(divide(multiply(A_1,B_2),C_3),B_9),divide(A_1,C_3)),B_2) = B_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_7,c_17]) ).

tff(c_180,plain,
    ! [B_28,A_25,B_26,C_27] : ( divide(divide(B_28,divide(divide(multiply(A_25,inverse(B_26)),C_27),divide(A_25,C_27))),B_28) = B_26 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_148,c_26]) ).

tff(c_233,plain,
    ! [B_28,B_26] : ( divide(multiply(B_28,B_26),B_28) = B_26 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_7,c_180]) ).

tff(c_238,plain,
    ! [B_29,B_30] : ( divide(multiply(B_29,B_30),B_29) = B_30 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_7,c_180]) ).

tff(c_684,plain,
    ! [B_43,B_44] : ( multiply(multiply(inverse(B_43),B_44),B_43) = B_44 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_238]) ).

tff(c_1151,plain,
    ! [B_51,B_52] : ( divide(B_51,multiply(inverse(B_52),B_51)) = B_52 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_684,c_233]) ).

tff(c_33,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_9,B_5] : ( divide(multiply(multiply(A_8,B_9),B_5),divide(A_8,inverse(B_5))) = B_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_17]) ).

tff(c_41,plain,
    ! [A_11,B_12,B_13] : ( divide(multiply(multiply(A_11,B_12),B_13),multiply(A_11,B_13)) = B_12 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_33]) ).

tff(c_47,plain,
    ! [B_12,A_11,B_13] : ( divide(B_12,divide(multiply(A_11,B_12),multiply(A_11,B_13))) = B_13 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_41,c_7]) ).

tff(c_1176,plain,
    ! [B_52,B_12] : ( multiply(inverse(B_52),B_12) = divide(B_12,B_52) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1151,c_47]) ).

tff(c_282,plain,
    ! [B_5,B_30] : ( multiply(multiply(inverse(B_5),B_30),B_5) = B_30 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_238]) ).

tff(c_1374,plain,
    ! [B_57,B_58] : ( multiply(divide(B_57,B_58),B_58) = B_57 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1176,c_282]) ).

tff(c_1472,plain,
    ! [B_28,B_26] : ( multiply(B_28,B_26) = multiply(B_26,B_28) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_233,c_1374]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    multiply(b,a) != multiply(a,b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_1749,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1472,c_6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GRP564-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:25:37 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.08/2.03  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.08/2.04  
% 4.08/2.04  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.28/2.07  
% 4.28/2.07  Inference rules
% 4.28/2.07  ----------------------
% 4.28/2.07  #Ref     : 0
% 4.28/2.07  #Sup     : 450
% 4.28/2.07  #Fact    : 0
% 4.28/2.07  #Define  : 0
% 4.28/2.07  #Split   : 0
% 4.28/2.07  #Chain   : 0
% 4.28/2.07  #Close   : 0
% 4.28/2.07  
% 4.28/2.07  Ordering : KBO
% 4.28/2.07  
% 4.28/2.07  Simplification rules
% 4.28/2.07  ----------------------
% 4.28/2.07  #Subsume      : 22
% 4.28/2.07  #Demod        : 176
% 4.28/2.07  #Tautology    : 151
% 4.28/2.07  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.28/2.07  #BackRed      : 5
% 4.28/2.07  
% 4.28/2.07  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.28/2.07  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.28/2.07  
% 4.28/2.07  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.28/2.07  ----------------------
% 4.28/2.08  Preprocessing        : 0.39
% 4.28/2.08  Parsing              : 0.21
% 4.28/2.08  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 4.28/2.08  Main loop            : 0.62
% 4.28/2.08  Inferencing          : 0.25
% 4.28/2.08  Reduction            : 0.19
% 4.28/2.08  Demodulation         : 0.15
% 4.28/2.08  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 4.28/2.08  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 4.28/2.08  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 4.28/2.08  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.28/2.08  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.28/2.08  Total                : 1.06
% 4.28/2.08  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.28/2.08  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.28/2.08  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.28/2.08  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------