TSTP Solution File: GRP562-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP562-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:41:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.71s 2.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  18 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   3   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (;  42   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > divide > #nlpp > inverse > b2 > a2

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(divide,type,
    divide: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b2,type,
    b2: $i ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(a2,type,
    a2: $i ).

tff(f_25,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( multiply(A,B) = divide(A,inverse(B)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_23,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : ( divide(divide(divide(A,inverse(B)),C),divide(A,C)) = B ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5] : ( divide(A_4,inverse(B_5)) = multiply(A_4,B_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2,C_3] : ( divide(divide(divide(A_1,inverse(B_2)),C_3),divide(A_1,C_3)) = B_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).

tff(c_7,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2,C_3] : ( divide(divide(multiply(A_1,B_2),C_3),divide(A_1,C_3)) = B_2 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_2]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_9,C_10] : ( divide(divide(multiply(A_8,B_9),C_10),divide(A_8,C_10)) = B_9 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_2]) ).

tff(c_57,plain,
    ! [A_14,B_15,C_16,B_17] : ( divide(divide(multiply(divide(multiply(A_14,B_15),C_16),B_17),divide(A_14,C_16)),B_15) = B_17 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_7,c_17]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    ! [A_25,B_26,C_27,B_28] : ( multiply(divide(multiply(divide(multiply(A_25,inverse(B_26)),C_27),B_28),divide(A_25,C_27)),B_26) = B_28 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_57]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2,C_3,B_9] : ( divide(divide(multiply(divide(multiply(A_1,B_2),C_3),B_9),divide(A_1,C_3)),B_2) = B_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_7,c_17]) ).

tff(c_180,plain,
    ! [B_28,A_25,B_26,C_27] : ( divide(divide(B_28,divide(divide(multiply(A_25,inverse(B_26)),C_27),divide(A_25,C_27))),B_28) = B_26 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_148,c_26]) ).

tff(c_238,plain,
    ! [B_29,B_30] : ( divide(multiply(B_29,B_30),B_29) = B_30 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_7,c_180]) ).

tff(c_287,plain,
    ! [B_31,B_32] : ( divide(B_31,divide(B_32,B_32)) = B_31 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_238,c_7]) ).

tff(c_233,plain,
    ! [B_28,B_26] : ( divide(multiply(B_28,B_26),B_28) = B_26 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_7,c_180]) ).

tff(c_396,plain,
    ! [B_33,B_34] : ( multiply(divide(B_33,B_33),B_34) = B_34 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_287,c_233]) ).

tff(c_452,plain,
    ! [B_5,B_34] : ( multiply(multiply(inverse(B_5),B_5),B_34) = B_34 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_396]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_1209,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_452,c_6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : GRP562-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.15/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:31:10 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.71/2.03  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.71/2.03  
% 3.71/2.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.85/2.06  
% 3.85/2.06  Inference rules
% 3.85/2.06  ----------------------
% 3.85/2.06  #Ref     : 0
% 3.85/2.06  #Sup     : 306
% 3.85/2.06  #Fact    : 0
% 3.85/2.06  #Define  : 0
% 3.85/2.06  #Split   : 0
% 3.85/2.06  #Chain   : 0
% 3.85/2.06  #Close   : 0
% 3.85/2.06  
% 3.85/2.06  Ordering : KBO
% 3.85/2.06  
% 3.85/2.06  Simplification rules
% 3.85/2.06  ----------------------
% 3.85/2.06  #Subsume      : 22
% 3.85/2.06  #Demod        : 126
% 3.85/2.06  #Tautology    : 104
% 3.85/2.06  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.85/2.06  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.85/2.06  
% 3.85/2.06  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.85/2.06  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.85/2.06  
% 3.85/2.06  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.85/2.06  ----------------------
% 3.85/2.07  Preprocessing        : 0.40
% 3.85/2.07  Parsing              : 0.21
% 3.85/2.07  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.85/2.07  Main loop            : 0.50
% 3.85/2.07  Inferencing          : 0.20
% 3.85/2.07  Reduction            : 0.15
% 3.85/2.07  Demodulation         : 0.12
% 3.85/2.07  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.85/2.07  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 3.85/2.07  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 3.85/2.07  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.85/2.07  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.85/2.07  Total                : 0.94
% 3.85/2.07  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.85/2.07  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.85/2.07  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.85/2.07  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------