TSTP Solution File: GRP561-1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : GRP561-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:16:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 29 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f85,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f4,f71]) ).
fof(f71,plain,
! [X14,X15] : divide(X15,X15) = divide(X14,X14),
inference(superposition,[],[f61,f26]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X10,X11] : divide(X11,divide(X10,X10)) = X11,
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f20]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
! [X3,X1] : divide(divide(X3,inverse(X1)),X3) = X1,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f12,f1]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : divide(divide(X3,divide(divide(divide(X0,inverse(inverse(X1))),X2),divide(X0,X2))),X3) = X1,
inference(superposition,[],[f6,f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : divide(divide(divide(divide(divide(X0,inverse(X1)),X2),inverse(X3)),divide(X0,X2)),X1) = X3,
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : divide(divide(divide(X0,inverse(X1)),X2),divide(X0,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).
fof(f61,plain,
! [X10,X11] : divide(X11,divide(X11,X10)) = X10,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f54,f39]) ).
fof(f39,plain,
! [X10,X9] : divide(divide(X9,X9),inverse(X10)) = X10,
inference(superposition,[],[f20,f26]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
! [X10,X11,X9] : divide(X11,divide(divide(divide(X9,X9),inverse(X11)),X10)) = X10,
inference(superposition,[],[f5,f39]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : divide(X1,divide(divide(X0,inverse(X1)),divide(X0,inverse(X2)))) = X2,
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f1]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1)) != divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1)),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f3,f2,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : divide(X0,inverse(X1)) = multiply(X0,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GRP561-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 22:44:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 % (9308)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:ep=RSTC:sos=all:urr=on:i=267:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/267Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (9300)lrs+10_1:128_plsq=on:plsqc=2:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:urr=on:i=321:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/321Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9291)lrs+10_1:1_br=off:ep=RSTC:sos=all:urr=on:i=20:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/20Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9293)lrs+1_3:1_ep=RSTC:sos=on:urr=on:i=33:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/33Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9294)dis+31_8:1_br=off:fd=off:gs=on:lcm=reverse:nm=16:nwc=5.0:sp=reverse_arity:urr=on:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)lrs+10_1:1_avsq=on:avsql=on:bsr=unit_only:drc=off:fsr=off:inw=on:nwc=10.0:rnwc=on:sgt=16:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsql=off:slsqr=211,119:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal_then_units:ss=included:st=2.0:to=lpo:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9290)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:fd=preordered:plsq=on:sp=occurrence:to=lpo:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/48Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)Time elapsed: 0.071 s
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (9292)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)Time elapsed: 0.068 s
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (9300)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50 % (9285)Success in time 0.161 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------