TSTP Solution File: GRP559-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP559-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:41:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 19.88s 8.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 20.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  36 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (  35 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   3   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (;  79   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > divide > #nlpp > inverse > c3 > b3 > a3

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a3,type,
    a3: $i ).

tff(c3,type,
    c3: $i ).

tff(divide,type,
    divide: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b3,type,
    b3: $i ).

tff(f_23,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : ( divide(A,inverse(divide(divide(B,C),divide(A,C)))) = B ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_25,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( multiply(A,B) = divide(A,inverse(B)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_9,C_10] : ( divide(A_8,inverse(divide(divide(B_9,C_10),divide(A_8,C_10)))) = B_9 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5] : ( divide(A_4,inverse(B_5)) = multiply(A_4,B_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_9,C_10] : ( multiply(A_8,divide(divide(B_9,C_10),divide(A_8,C_10))) = B_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16,c_4]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2,C_3] : ( divide(A_1,inverse(divide(divide(B_2,C_3),divide(A_1,C_3)))) = B_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_2,B_9,C_10] : ( divide(A_8,inverse(divide(divide(B_2,inverse(divide(divide(B_9,C_10),divide(A_8,C_10)))),B_9))) = B_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16,c_2]) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    ! [A_17,B_18,B_19,C_20] : ( multiply(A_17,divide(multiply(B_18,divide(divide(B_19,C_20),divide(A_17,C_20))),B_19)) = B_18 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_4,c_22]) ).

tff(c_127,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_9] : ( multiply(A_8,divide(B_9,B_9)) = A_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_112]) ).

tff(c_150,plain,
    ! [A_21,B_22] : ( multiply(A_21,divide(B_22,B_22)) = A_21 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_112]) ).

tff(c_49,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_2,B_9,C_10] : ( multiply(A_8,divide(multiply(B_2,divide(divide(B_9,C_10),divide(A_8,C_10))),B_9)) = B_2 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_4,c_22]) ).

tff(c_195,plain,
    ! [B_23,A_24] : ( multiply(B_23,divide(A_24,B_23)) = A_24 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_49]) ).

tff(c_315,plain,
    ! [B_31,A_32] : ( multiply(inverse(B_31),multiply(A_32,B_31)) = A_32 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_195]) ).

tff(c_353,plain,
    ! [B_9,A_8] : ( multiply(inverse(divide(B_9,B_9)),A_8) = A_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_127,c_315]) ).

tff(c_503,plain,
    ! [B_39,A_40] : ( multiply(inverse(divide(B_39,B_39)),A_40) = A_40 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_127,c_315]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [A_8,A_4,B_5] : ( divide(A_8,inverse(divide(multiply(A_4,B_5),divide(A_8,inverse(B_5))))) = A_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_16]) ).

tff(c_54,plain,
    ! [A_8,A_4,B_5] : ( multiply(A_8,divide(multiply(A_4,B_5),multiply(A_8,B_5))) = A_4 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_4,c_40]) ).

tff(c_571,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5,B_39] : ( divide(multiply(A_4,B_5),multiply(inverse(divide(B_39,B_39)),B_5)) = A_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_503,c_54]) ).

tff(c_639,plain,
    ! [A_41,B_42] : ( divide(multiply(A_41,B_42),B_42) = A_41 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_353,c_571]) ).

tff(c_157,plain,
    ! [B_9,A_21] : ( multiply(B_9,divide(A_21,B_9)) = A_21 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_49]) ).

tff(c_654,plain,
    ! [B_42,A_41] : ( multiply(B_42,A_41) = multiply(A_41,B_42) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_639,c_157]) ).

tff(c_350,plain,
    ! [A_21,B_9] : ( multiply(inverse(divide(A_21,B_9)),A_21) = B_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_157,c_315]) ).

tff(c_2820,plain,
    ! [A_76,B_77] : ( inverse(divide(A_76,B_77)) = divide(B_77,A_76) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_350,c_639]) ).

tff(c_2888,plain,
    ! [B_5,A_4] : ( divide(inverse(B_5),A_4) = inverse(multiply(A_4,B_5)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_2820]) ).

tff(c_233,plain,
    ! [B_5,A_4] : ( multiply(inverse(B_5),multiply(A_4,B_5)) = A_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_195]) ).

tff(c_694,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5] : ( divide(A_4,multiply(A_4,B_5)) = inverse(B_5) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_233,c_639]) ).

tff(c_688,plain,
    ! [A_21,B_9] : ( inverse(divide(A_21,B_9)) = divide(B_9,A_21) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_350,c_639]) ).

tff(c_669,plain,
    ! [A_1,A_41,B_42] : ( divide(A_1,inverse(divide(A_41,divide(A_1,B_42)))) = multiply(A_41,B_42) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_639,c_2]) ).

tff(c_15081,plain,
    ! [A_198,B_199,A_200] : ( divide(A_198,divide(divide(A_198,B_199),A_200)) = multiply(A_200,B_199) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_688,c_669]) ).

tff(c_15306,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5,A_200] : ( divide(A_4,divide(inverse(B_5),A_200)) = multiply(A_200,multiply(A_4,B_5)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_694,c_15081]) ).

tff(c_15401,plain,
    ! [A_4,A_200,B_5] : ( multiply(A_4,multiply(A_200,B_5)) = multiply(A_200,multiply(A_4,B_5)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_2888,c_15306]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_725,plain,
    multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_654,c_6]) ).

tff(c_56019,plain,
    multiply(a3,multiply(c3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_15401,c_725]) ).

tff(c_56022,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_654,c_56019]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem  : GRP559-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:15:30 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 19.88/8.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 19.88/8.88  
% 19.88/8.88  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 20.02/8.94  
% 20.02/8.94  Inference rules
% 20.02/8.94  ----------------------
% 20.02/8.94  #Ref     : 0
% 20.02/8.94  #Sup     : 14003
% 20.02/8.94  #Fact    : 0
% 20.02/8.94  #Define  : 0
% 20.02/8.94  #Split   : 0
% 20.02/8.94  #Chain   : 0
% 20.02/8.94  #Close   : 0
% 20.02/8.94  
% 20.02/8.94  Ordering : KBO
% 20.02/8.94  
% 20.02/8.94  Simplification rules
% 20.02/8.94  ----------------------
% 20.02/8.94  #Subsume      : 916
% 20.02/8.94  #Demod        : 28130
% 20.02/8.94  #Tautology    : 5329
% 20.02/8.94  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 20.02/8.94  #BackRed      : 61
% 20.02/8.94  
% 20.02/8.94  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 20.02/8.94  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 20.02/8.94  
% 20.02/8.94  Timing (in seconds)
% 20.02/8.94  ----------------------
% 20.02/8.94  Preprocessing        : 0.37
% 20.02/8.95  Parsing              : 0.20
% 20.02/8.95  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 20.02/8.95  Main loop            : 7.46
% 20.02/8.95  Inferencing          : 1.55
% 20.02/8.95  Reduction            : 4.64
% 20.02/8.95  Demodulation         : 4.34
% 20.02/8.95  BG Simplification    : 0.22
% 20.02/8.95  Subsumption          : 0.70
% 20.02/8.95  Abstraction          : 0.39
% 20.02/8.95  MUC search           : 0.00
% 20.02/8.95  Cooper               : 0.00
% 20.02/8.95  Total                : 7.92
% 20.02/8.95  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 20.02/8.95  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 20.02/8.95  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 20.02/8.95  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------