TSTP Solution File: GRP554-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP554-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:42:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 15 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
divide(divide(X1,inverse(divide(X2,divide(X1,X3)))),X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TLrzuTLliP/E---3.1_2170.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TLrzuTLliP/E---3.1_2170.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TLrzuTLliP/E---3.1_2170.p',multiply) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
divide(divide(X1,inverse(divide(X2,divide(X1,X3)))),X3) = X2,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
divide(divide(divide(X1,inverse(divide(X2,divide(X1,X3)))),inverse(divide(X4,X2))),X3) = X4,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
divide(X1,inverse(divide(X2,X1))) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),inverse(X1)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)) = inverse(divide(X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
prove_these_axioms_2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
inverse(divide(divide(X1,X2),X1)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
divide(divide(inverse(b2),inverse(b2)),inverse(a2)) != a2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,X2))) = inverse(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
inverse(divide(divide(b2,b2),a2)) != a2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
inverse(divide(divide(X1,X1),X2)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GRP554-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:36:22 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TLrzuTLliP/E---3.1_2170.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2249 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2253 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.16/0.45 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.16/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.16/0.45 # Generated clauses : 83
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 69
% 0.16/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Paramodulations : 83
% 0.16/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 31
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 59
% 0.16/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 59
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.16/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 893
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1560 pages
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.16/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------