TSTP Solution File: GRP548-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : GRP548-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:18:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP548-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 01:36:30 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.39  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 1 (identity): identity = divide(X, X).
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 2 (inverse): inverse(X) = divide(identity, X).
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 3 (multiply): multiply(X, Y) = divide(X, divide(identity, Y)).
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 4 (single_axiom): divide(divide(identity, divide(X, Y)), divide(divide(Y, Z), X)) = Z.
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Lemma 5: inverse(identity) = identity.
% 0.20/0.40  Proof:
% 0.20/0.40    inverse(identity)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 2 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.40    divide(identity, identity)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 1 (identity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    identity
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Lemma 6: divide(X, inverse(Y)) = multiply(X, Y).
% 0.20/0.40  Proof:
% 0.20/0.40    divide(X, inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 2 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.40    divide(X, divide(identity, Y))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 3 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(X, Y)
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Lemma 7: divide(inverse(divide(X, Y)), divide(divide(Y, Z), X)) = Z.
% 0.20/0.40  Proof:
% 0.20/0.40    divide(inverse(divide(X, Y)), divide(divide(Y, Z), X))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 2 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.40    divide(divide(identity, divide(X, Y)), divide(divide(Y, Z), X))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 4 (single_axiom) }
% 0.20/0.40    Z
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Lemma 8: multiply(inverse(divide(X, Y)), X) = Y.
% 0.20/0.40  Proof:
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(X, Y)), X)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    divide(inverse(divide(X, Y)), inverse(X))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 2 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.40    divide(inverse(divide(X, Y)), divide(identity, X))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 1 (identity) }
% 0.20/0.40    divide(inverse(divide(X, Y)), divide(divide(Y, Y), X))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.20/0.40    Y
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Lemma 9: multiply(identity, X) = X.
% 0.20/0.40  Proof:
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(identity, X)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(identity), X)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 1 (identity) }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(X, X)), X)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.20/0.40    X
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Lemma 10: inverse(inverse(X)) = multiply(identity, X).
% 0.20/0.40  Proof:
% 0.20/0.40    inverse(inverse(X))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 2 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.40    divide(identity, inverse(X))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(identity, X)
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms_4): multiply(a, b) = multiply(b, a).
% 0.20/0.40  Proof:
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(a, b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(multiply(identity, a), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(inverse(a)), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(inverse(divide(identity, b)), divide(divide(b, inverse(a)), identity))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(inverse(divide(identity, b)), divide(multiply(identity, divide(b, inverse(a))), identity))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(inverse(divide(identity, b)), divide(inverse(inverse(divide(b, inverse(a)))), identity))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(inverse(divide(identity, b)), divide(inverse(inverse(divide(b, inverse(a)))), inverse(identity)))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(inverse(divide(identity, b)), multiply(inverse(inverse(divide(b, inverse(a)))), identity))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 2 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(inverse(divide(identity, b)), multiply(inverse(divide(identity, divide(b, inverse(a)))), identity))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(inverse(divide(identity, b)), divide(b, inverse(a)))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 2 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(inverse(inverse(b)), divide(b, inverse(a)))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(multiply(identity, b), divide(b, inverse(a)))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(inverse(divide(b, divide(b, inverse(a)))), b)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.20/0.40    divide(b, inverse(a))
% 0.20/0.40  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.20/0.40    multiply(b, a)
% 0.20/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------