TSTP Solution File: GRP544-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : GRP544-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:19:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GRP544-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 12:17:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/0.98 Process 13105 was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/0.98 Mon Jun 13 12:17:23 2022
% 0.42/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_12951_n015.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_12951_n015.cluster.edu
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (5 formulas)
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 Auto_denials:
% 0.42/0.98 % copying label prove_these_axioms_4 to answer in negative clause
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % Assigning unary symbol inverse kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (7).
% 0.42/0.98 Function symbol KB weights: identity=1. a=1. b=1. divide=1. multiply=1. inverse=0.
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.42/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: prove_these_axioms_4.
% 0.42/0.98 % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.42/0.98 % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.42/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.42/0.98 % Given clauses 12.
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 1 identity = divide(A,A) # label(identity) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 2 divide(A,A) = identity. [copy(1),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.98 4 multiply(A,B) = divide(A,divide(identity,B)) # label(multiply) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 5 divide(divide(identity,divide(divide(divide(A,B),C),A)),C) = B # label(single_axiom) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 6 multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a) # label(prove_these_axioms_4) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_these_axioms_4). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 7 divide(b,divide(identity,a)) != divide(a,divide(identity,b)) # answer(prove_these_axioms_4). [copy(6),rewrite([4(3),4(8)]),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.98 8 divide(divide(identity,divide(divide(identity,A),B)),A) = B. [para(2(a,1),5(a,1,1,2,1,1))].
% 0.42/0.98 9 divide(divide(identity,divide(identity,A)),divide(A,B)) = B. [para(2(a,1),5(a,1,1,2,1))].
% 0.42/0.98 18 divide(identity,divide(identity,A)) = A. [para(2(a,1),9(a,1,1,2)),rewrite([2(3)])].
% 0.42/0.98 20 divide(divide(identity,A),divide(identity,B)) = divide(B,A). [para(9(a,1),8(a,1,1,2))].
% 0.42/0.98 22 divide(A,divide(A,B)) = B. [back_rewrite(9),rewrite([18(4)])].
% 0.42/0.98 26 divide(A,divide(identity,B)) = divide(B,divide(identity,A)). [para(22(a,1),20(a,1,1))].
% 0.42/0.98 27 $F # answer(prove_these_axioms_4). [resolve(26,a,7,a)].
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 Given=12. Generated=88. Kept=24. proofs=1.
% 0.42/0.98 Usable=7. Sos=4. Demods=10. Limbo=0, Disabled=17. Hints=0.
% 0.42/0.98 Megabytes=0.04.
% 0.42/0.98 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.42/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 Process 13105 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jun 13 12:17:23 2022
% 0.42/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------