TSTP Solution File: GRP535-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP535-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:42:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.40s 300.17s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 20 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 19 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tegqI3LNLC/E---3.1_1408.p',multiply) ).
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
divide(divide(X1,divide(divide(X1,X2),X3)),X2) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tegqI3LNLC/E---3.1_1408.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tegqI3LNLC/E---3.1_1408.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
divide(divide(X1,divide(divide(X1,X2),X3)),X2) = X3,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
multiply(divide(X1,divide(multiply(X1,X2),X3)),X2) = X3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
divide(multiply(X1,X2),X1) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
multiply(divide(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
multiply(X1,divide(X2,divide(multiply(X2,X1),X3))) = X3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
divide(X1,divide(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
multiply(X1,divide(X2,X3)) = divide(multiply(X2,X1),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
prove_these_axioms_3 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
multiply(divide(X1,X2),X3) = divide(multiply(X1,X3),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_3]),c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X3,multiply(X2,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_3]),c_0_3]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
multiply(b3,multiply(a3,c3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : GRP535-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:55:51 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tegqI3LNLC/E---3.1_1408.p
% 0.40/300.17 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.40/300.17 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/300.17 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # new_bool_3 with pid 1551 completed with status 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.40/300.17 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/300.17 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.40/300.17 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.40/300.17 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 1556 completed with status 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.40/300.17 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/300.17 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.40/300.17 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.40/300.17 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.40/300.17 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.40/300.17 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.40/300.17
% 0.40/300.17 # Proof found!
% 0.40/300.17 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/300.17 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/300.17 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.40/300.17 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 0.40/300.17 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.40/300.17 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.40/300.17 # Processed clauses : 69
% 0.40/300.17 # ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.40/300.17 # ...subsumed : 32
% 0.40/300.17 # ...remaining for further processing : 29
% 0.40/300.17 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.40/300.17 # Generated clauses : 435
% 0.40/300.17 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 286
% 0.40/300.17 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Paramodulations : 435
% 0.40/300.17 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # NegExts : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Total rewrite steps : 350
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/300.17 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/300.17 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.40/300.17 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/300.17 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/300.17 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.40/300.17 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.40/300.17 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.40/300.17 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 212
% 0.40/300.17 # ...number of literals in the above : 212
% 0.40/300.17 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.40/300.17 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.40/300.17 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 16
% 0.40/300.17 # BW rewrite match attempts : 81
% 0.40/300.17 # BW rewrite match successes : 46
% 0.40/300.17 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.40/300.17 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2725
% 0.40/300.17
% 0.40/300.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/300.17 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.40/300.17 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.40/300.17 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.40/300.17 # Maximum resident set size: 1428 pages
% 0.40/300.17
% 0.40/300.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/300.17 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.40/300.17 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.40/300.17 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.40/300.17 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.40/300.17 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.40/300.17 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------