TSTP Solution File: GRP530-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : GRP530-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:18:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.38s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : GRP530-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 00:26:29 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.38 Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.39 Axiom 1 (inverse): inverse(X) = divide(divide(Y, Y), X).
% 0.20/0.39 Axiom 2 (multiply): multiply(X, Y) = divide(X, divide(divide(Z, Z), Y)).
% 0.20/0.39 Axiom 3 (single_axiom): divide(divide(X, divide(Y, Z)), divide(X, Y)) = Z.
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 Lemma 4: divide(X, inverse(Y)) = multiply(X, Y).
% 0.20/0.39 Proof:
% 0.20/0.39 divide(X, inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.39 divide(X, divide(divide(Z, Z), Y))
% 0.20/0.39 = { by axiom 2 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.20/0.39 multiply(X, Y)
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms_2): multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2) = a2.
% 0.20/0.39 Proof:
% 0.20/0.39 multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2)
% 0.20/0.39 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.20/0.39 divide(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), inverse(a2))
% 0.20/0.39 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.20/0.39 divide(divide(inverse(b2), inverse(b2)), inverse(a2))
% 0.20/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.20/0.39 inverse(inverse(a2))
% 0.20/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.39 inverse(divide(divide(a2, a2), a2))
% 0.20/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.39 divide(divide(divide(a2, a2), divide(a2, a2)), divide(divide(a2, a2), a2))
% 0.20/0.39 = { by axiom 3 (single_axiom) }
% 0.20/0.39 a2
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------