TSTP Solution File: GRP524-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : GRP524-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 07:00:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.81s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 25 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 24 equ; 1 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
divide(X0,divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(X0,X1)))) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
divide(X0,divide(divide(X1,X1),X2)) = multiply(X0,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
divide(divide(X0,X0),X1) = inverse(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_4) ).
cnf(c_64,plain,
divide(X0,inverse(X1)) = multiply(X0,X1),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_105,plain,
divide(inverse(divide(X0,X0)),X1) = inverse(X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_110,plain,
multiply(divide(X0,X0),X1) = inverse(inverse(X1)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_119,plain,
multiply(inverse(divide(X0,X0)),X1) = inverse(inverse(X1)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_64]) ).
cnf(c_205,plain,
divide(X0,divide(divide(X1,divide(X2,X0)),X1)) = X2,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_290,plain,
divide(X0,inverse(divide(X1,X0))) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_205]) ).
cnf(c_409,plain,
multiply(X0,divide(X1,X0)) = X1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_290,c_64]) ).
cnf(c_414,plain,
multiply(X0,inverse(X0)) = divide(X1,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_409]) ).
cnf(c_415,plain,
multiply(inverse(X0),multiply(X1,X0)) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_409]) ).
cnf(c_489,plain,
divide(X0,X0) = divide(X1,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_414,c_414]) ).
cnf(c_641,plain,
multiply(X0,divide(X1,X1)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_489,c_409]) ).
cnf(c_724,plain,
inverse(inverse(multiply(X0,divide(X1,X1)))) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_415,c_119]) ).
cnf(c_726,plain,
inverse(inverse(X0)) = X0,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_724,c_641]) ).
cnf(c_729,plain,
multiply(divide(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_726]) ).
cnf(c_769,plain,
divide(X0,divide(X1,X1)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_729,c_409]) ).
cnf(c_790,plain,
divide(X0,divide(X0,X1)) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_769,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_868,plain,
multiply(divide(X0,X1),X1) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_790,c_409]) ).
cnf(c_911,plain,
multiply(inverse(X0),X1) = divide(X1,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_868,c_415]) ).
cnf(c_915,plain,
divide(multiply(X0,X1),X1) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_415,c_911]) ).
cnf(c_946,plain,
multiply(X0,X1) = multiply(X1,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_915,c_409]) ).
cnf(c_949,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_946]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : GRP524-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 08:07:24 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule casc_j12_ueq --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.81/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.81/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 ------ iProver source info
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 1.81/1.19 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 1.81/1.19 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.81/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.81/1.19 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 clauses 4
% 1.81/1.19 conjectures 1
% 1.81/1.19 EPR 0
% 1.81/1.19 Horn 4
% 1.81/1.19 unary 4
% 1.81/1.19 binary 0
% 1.81/1.19 lits 4
% 1.81/1.19 lits eq 4
% 1.81/1.19 fd_pure 0
% 1.81/1.19 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.81/1.19 fd_cond 0
% 1.81/1.19 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.81/1.19 AC symbols 0
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 ------
% 1.81/1.19 Current options:
% 1.81/1.19 ------
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.81/1.19
% 1.81/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------