TSTP Solution File: GRP518-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : GRP518-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:18:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.37s
% Output : Proof 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : GRP518-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 02:50:55 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.11/0.37
% 0.11/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.37
% 0.11/0.37 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.11/0.37 Axiom 1 (single_axiom): multiply(X, multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z), Y)) = Z.
% 0.11/0.37
% 0.11/0.37 Lemma 2: multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), X) = Y.
% 0.11/0.37 Proof:
% 0.11/0.37 multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), X)
% 0.11/0.37 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.11/0.37 multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), Z)), X), Z)))
% 0.11/0.37 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.11/0.37 multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), Z)), X), Z))), Y), multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), Z)), X), Z)))
% 0.11/0.37 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.11/0.37 Y
% 0.11/0.37
% 0.11/0.37 Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms_2): multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2) = a2.
% 0.11/0.37 Proof:
% 0.11/0.37 multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2)
% 0.11/0.37 = { by lemma 2 R->L }
% 0.11/0.37 multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), a2), b2))
% 0.11/0.37 = { by lemma 2 R->L }
% 0.11/0.37 multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), b2)), a2), b2))
% 0.11/0.37 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.11/0.37 a2
% 0.11/0.37 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.11/0.37
% 0.11/0.37 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------