TSTP Solution File: GRP518-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP518-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:42:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X3),X2)) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JL4s1ttu4z/E---3.1_11986.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JL4s1ttu4z/E---3.1_11986.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).
cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X3),X2)) = X3,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X3),multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X4)),X2),X4))) = X3,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X3)),X4),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X4,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),X1) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X2))) = X3,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X2),X3)),X2) = multiply(X1,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X3)) = multiply(inverse(X2),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X2,multiply(X3,X1))) = multiply(X2,X3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_2]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
prove_these_axioms_2 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X2))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
multiply(b2,multiply(a2,inverse(b2))) != a2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]),c_0_12]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : GRP518-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:04:08 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JL4s1ttu4z/E---3.1_11986.p
% 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # new_bool_1 with pid 12067 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12072 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 53
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 13
% 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 29
% 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 690
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 571
% 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 690
% 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 356
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 518
% 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 518
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 88
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 67
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5789
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1424 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------