TSTP Solution File: GRP517-1 by Moca---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : GRP517-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:55:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 11.92s 12.10s
% Output   : Proof 11.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : GRP517-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 21:37:02 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.92/12.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.92/12.10  % SZS output start Proof
% 11.92/12.10  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(A, multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(A, B)), C), B)) = C
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = multiply(inverse(b1), b1) ==> \bottom
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  This holds because
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  E:
% 11.92/12.10  	f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) = true__
% 11.92/12.10  	f1(multiply(inverse(b1), b1)) = false__
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(A, multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(A, B)), C), B)) = C
% 11.92/12.10  G:
% 11.92/12.10  	true__ = false__
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  This holds because
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(X1, multiply(Y0, X2)) = multiply(multiply(inverse(Y2), multiply(X1, X2)), multiply(Y0, Y2))
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(X1, multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1, X2)), Y1), multiply(Y2, X2))) = multiply(Y2, Y1)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(X2, multiply(X0, X1)) = multiply(X0, multiply(X2, X1))
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, X1) = multiply(multiply(inverse(Y2), X1), multiply(Y0, Y2))
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, Y1) = multiply(Y1, Y0)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, multiply(X2, X1)) = multiply(multiply(inverse(X0), X1), multiply(Y0, multiply(X2, X0)))
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, multiply(X2, Y1)) = multiply(multiply(inverse(X1), X2), multiply(Y0, multiply(X1, Y1)))
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, multiply(multiply(inverse(X2), Y2), multiply(Y1, X2))) = multiply(Y1, multiply(Y0, Y2))
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(X1, multiply(inverse(Y0), X2)), multiply(Y2, Y0)) = multiply(Y2, multiply(X1, X2))
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(X2), Y1), multiply(Y0, X2)) = multiply(multiply(inverse(Y2), Y1), multiply(Y0, Y2))
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(Y0), Y1), X1) = multiply(multiply(inverse(Y0), X1), Y1)
% 11.92/12.10  	f1(g1) -> false__
% 11.92/12.10  	f1(g1) -> true__
% 11.92/12.10  	f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) -> true__
% 11.92/12.10  	f1(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2), a1), multiply(inverse(a1), X2))) -> true__
% 11.92/12.10  	inverse(g1) -> g1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(A, multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(A, B)), C), B)) -> C
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, g1) -> Y0
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, inverse(Y0)) -> g1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, multiply(X1, multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1, multiply(Y0, X2))), Y2), X2))) -> Y2
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, multiply(X1, multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(Y0, multiply(X1, X2))), Y2), X2))) -> Y2
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y0, multiply(multiply(X1, multiply(inverse(multiply(Y0, Y1)), X2)), Y1)) -> multiply(X1, X2)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y1, multiply(Y0, multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(Y1, X1)), X2), X1))) -> multiply(Y0, X2)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(Y1, multiply(inverse(multiply(Y1, Y2)), Y2)) -> g1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(g1, Y1) -> Y1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(X1), multiply(multiply(inverse(Y1), X1), multiply(Y2, Y1))) -> Y2
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(Y1), Y1) -> g1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(Y1), multiply(Y2, Y1)) -> Y2
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(g1), Y1) -> Y1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(multiply(X0, X1)), multiply(multiply(inverse(Y1), Y2), multiply(X0, multiply(Y1, X1)))) -> Y2
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(multiply(X1, X0)), X1) -> inverse(X0)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(multiply(Y0, Y1)), multiply(Y0, X1)) -> multiply(inverse(Y1), X1)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(Y2, Y1)), X1), Y1)), X1) -> Y2
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(X1, multiply(inverse(Y0), X2)), Y0) -> multiply(X1, X2)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(X2), multiply(Y2, Y0)), multiply(multiply(inverse(Y0), Y1), X2)) -> multiply(Y2, Y1)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(Y1), X1), multiply(multiply(inverse(X1), Y2), Y1)) -> Y2
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(Y1), Y2), Y1) -> Y2
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(Y2), Y1), multiply(inverse(Y1), Y2)) -> g1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(Y3), Y1), multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(Y1, Y2)), X1), multiply(Y3, Y2))) -> X1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(g1), Y1), inverse(Y1)) -> g1
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(Y0), X1)), X2), X1) -> multiply(X2, Y0)
% 11.92/12.10  	multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(Y0, Y1)), X1)), X2), X1) -> multiply(Y0, multiply(X2, Y1))
% 11.92/12.10  	true__ -> false__
% 11.92/12.10  with the LPO induced by
% 11.92/12.10  	a1 > b1 > inverse > g1 > multiply > f1 > true__ > false__
% 11.92/12.10  
% 11.92/12.10  % SZS output end Proof
% 11.92/12.10  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------