TSTP Solution File: GRP515-1 by E-SAT---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.2.0
% Problem  : GRP515-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d SAT

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:55:44 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  22 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   22 (  21 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,X3),inverse(multiply(X1,X3)))) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4RXYTldJ4R/E---3.1_27074.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4RXYTldJ4R/E---3.1_27074.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,X3),inverse(multiply(X1,X3)))) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,X3),inverse(multiply(X4,X3))))))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(X3,X4),inverse(multiply(X1,X4)))),inverse(X3))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(X3,X2)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,X3),inverse(X2))) = multiply(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,inverse(X1))) = multiply(X3,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(multiply(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,inverse(X3)),multiply(multiply(X3,X4),inverse(multiply(X1,X4))))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),inverse(X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_2]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X3,multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b3,multiply(a3,c3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.08  % Problem    : GRP515-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.08  % Command    : run_E %s %d SAT
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.27  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.27  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.27  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 10:16:53 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.27  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.36  Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.36  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4RXYTldJ4R/E---3.1_27074.p
% 0.12/0.38  # Version: 3.2.0
% 0.12/0.38  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.38  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # sh5l with pid 27158 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.12/0.38  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.38  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.38  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.38  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 27166 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.12/0.38  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.38  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.38  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.38  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.38  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.38  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.38  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.12/0.38  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Initial clauses                      : 2
% 0.12/0.38  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.12/0.38  # Processed clauses                    : 135
% 0.12/0.38  # ...of these trivial                  : 40
% 0.12/0.38  # ...subsumed                          : 54
% 0.12/0.38  # ...remaining for further processing  : 41
% 0.12/0.38  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 0.12/0.38  # Generated clauses                    : 1631
% 0.12/0.38  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1258
% 0.12/0.38  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Paramodulations                      : 1631
% 0.12/0.38  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1500
% 0.12/0.38  # ...of those cached                   : 714
% 0.12/0.38  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.38  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.38  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.38  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.38  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.38  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.38  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.38  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.38  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.38  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.38  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.38  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.38  # Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 0.12/0.38  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 0.12/0.38  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.12/0.38  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.38  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1062
% 0.12/0.38  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1062
% 0.12/0.38  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Current number of archived clauses   : 19
% 0.12/0.38  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.12/0.38  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 224
% 0.12/0.38  # BW rewrite match successes           : 144
% 0.12/0.38  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.38  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 20202
% 0.12/0.38  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.38  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.38  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.38  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.12/0.38  # Maximum resident set size: 1612 pages
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.38  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.38  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.38  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.12/0.38  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.12/0.38  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.12/0.39  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------