TSTP Solution File: GRP514-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : GRP514-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:57:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.60s 1.79s
% Output   : Refutation 1.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (  14 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    file('GRP514-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('GRP514-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(multiply(A,C)))) = B,
    file('GRP514-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(multiply(D,C))))))) = D,
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,3]),
    [iquote('para_into,3.1.1.2.1,3.1.1')] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,multiply(multiply(C,D),inverse(multiply(A,D)))),inverse(C))) = B,
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,3]),
    [iquote('para_into,3.1.1.2.2.1,3.1.1')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(B))) = A,
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,3]),
    [iquote('para_into,5.1.1.2.2.1,3.1.1')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(A))) = B,
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,5]),
    [iquote('para_from,17.1.1,5.1.1.2.2.1')] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    multiply(multiply(A,B),multiply(C,inverse(multiply(C,B)))) = A,
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[21,5]),
    [iquote('para_from,21.1.1,5.1.1.2.2.1')] ).

cnf(48,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(B))) = multiply(A,C),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,21]),
    [iquote('para_into,7.1.1.2.1,21.1.1')] ).

cnf(63,plain,
    multiply(multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(B,C)))),C) = A,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[25,25]),48]),
    [iquote('para_into,25.1.1.2.2.1,25.1.1,demod,48')] ).

cnf(123,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(B,inverse(C))))) = multiply(A,C),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[63,48])]),
    [iquote('para_from,63.1.1,47.1.1.2,flip.1')] ).

cnf(124,plain,
    multiply(A,B) = multiply(B,A),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[63,21]),123]),
    [iquote('para_from,63.1.1,21.1.1.2,demod,123')] ).

cnf(150,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(inverse(B),B)) = A,
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[124,17]),
    [iquote('para_from,124.1.1,17.1.1.2')] ).

cnf(155,plain,
    a2 != a2,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[124,1]),150]),
    [iquote('para_from,124.1.1,1.1.1,demod,150')] ).

cnf(156,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[155,2]),
    [iquote('binary,155.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : GRP514-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 05:29:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.60/1.79  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.60/1.79  The process was started by sandbox on n016.cluster.edu,
% 1.60/1.79  Wed Jul 27 05:29:07 2022
% 1.60/1.79  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 19040.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.60/1.79  set(auto).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.60/1.79  clear(print_given).
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  list(usable).
% 1.60/1.79  0 [] A=A.
% 1.60/1.79  0 [] multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(multiply(A,C))))=B.
% 1.60/1.79  0 [] multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2)!=a2.
% 1.60/1.79  end_of_list.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.60/1.79  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.60/1.79     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  ------------> process usable:
% 1.60/1.79  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2)!=a2.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  ------------> process sos:
% 1.60/1.79  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] A=A.
% 1.60/1.79  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 3 [] multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(multiply(A,C))))=B.
% 1.60/1.79  ---> New Demodulator: 4 [new_demod,3] multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(multiply(A,C))))=B.
% 1.60/1.79    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.60/1.79  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 4.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 156 [binary,155.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Length of proof is 11.  Level of proof is 9.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.60/1.79  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.60/1.79  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.60/1.79  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  ============ end of search ============
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.60/1.79  clauses given                 10
% 1.60/1.79  clauses generated            146
% 1.60/1.79  clauses kept                  82
% 1.60/1.79  clauses forward subsumed     115
% 1.60/1.79  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.60/1.79  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.60/1.79  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.60/1.79  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.60/1.79  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Process 19040 finished Wed Jul 27 05:29:08 2022
% 1.60/1.79  Otter interrupted
% 1.60/1.79  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------