TSTP Solution File: GRP510-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : GRP510-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:18:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : GRP510-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 21:11:50 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.40 Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.41 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 1 (single_axiom): multiply(multiply(multiply(X, Y), Z), inverse(multiply(X, Z))) = Y.
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Lemma 2: multiply(X, inverse(multiply(multiply(Y, X), inverse(multiply(Y, Z))))) = Z.
% 0.21/0.41 Proof:
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(X, inverse(multiply(multiply(Y, X), inverse(multiply(Y, Z)))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(Y, X), Z), inverse(multiply(Y, Z))), inverse(multiply(multiply(Y, X), inverse(multiply(Y, Z)))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.21/0.41 Z
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Lemma 3: multiply(X, multiply(multiply(Y, Z), inverse(multiply(Y, Z)))) = X.
% 0.21/0.41 Proof:
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(X, multiply(multiply(Y, Z), inverse(multiply(Y, Z))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by lemma 2 R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(X, multiply(multiply(multiply(Y, inverse(multiply(multiply(W, Y), inverse(multiply(W, Y))))), Z), inverse(multiply(Y, Z))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(X, inverse(multiply(multiply(W, Y), inverse(multiply(W, Y)))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by lemma 2 R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(X, inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(W, inverse(multiply(multiply(V, W), inverse(multiply(V, W))))), Y), inverse(multiply(W, Y)))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(X, inverse(inverse(multiply(multiply(V, W), inverse(multiply(V, W))))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(X, inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(W, inverse(multiply(multiply(V, W), inverse(multiply(V, W))))), X), inverse(multiply(W, X)))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by lemma 2 }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(X, inverse(multiply(multiply(W, X), inverse(multiply(W, X)))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by lemma 2 }
% 0.21/0.41 X
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Lemma 4: multiply(multiply(X, Y), inverse(X)) = Y.
% 0.21/0.41 Proof:
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(multiply(X, Y), inverse(X))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by lemma 3 R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(multiply(X, Y), inverse(multiply(X, multiply(multiply(Z, W), inverse(multiply(Z, W))))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by lemma 3 R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(multiply(multiply(X, Y), multiply(multiply(Z, W), inverse(multiply(Z, W)))), inverse(multiply(X, multiply(multiply(Z, W), inverse(multiply(Z, W))))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.21/0.41 Y
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Lemma 5: multiply(multiply(X, inverse(X)), Y) = Y.
% 0.21/0.41 Proof:
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(multiply(X, inverse(X)), Y)
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(multiply(multiply(X, multiply(multiply(X, inverse(X)), Y)), inverse(X)), inverse(multiply(X, inverse(X))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.21/0.41 multiply(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(X)), Y), inverse(multiply(X, inverse(X))))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.21/0.42 Y
% 0.21/0.42
% 0.21/0.42 Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms_2): multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2) = a2.
% 0.21/0.42 Proof:
% 0.21/0.42 multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2)
% 0.21/0.42 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(X, b2), inverse(b2)), inverse(multiply(X, b2))), b2), a2)
% 0.21/0.42 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(Y, inverse(Y)), X), b2), inverse(b2)), inverse(multiply(X, b2))), b2), a2)
% 0.21/0.42 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(Y, inverse(Y)), X), b2), inverse(multiply(multiply(Y, inverse(Y)), b2))), inverse(multiply(X, b2))), b2), a2)
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.21/0.42 multiply(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))), b2), a2)
% 0.21/0.42 = { by lemma 2 R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 multiply(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, b2)), inverse(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))), inverse(multiply(X, b2)))))), a2)
% 0.21/0.42 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 multiply(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))), multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))), inverse(multiply(X, b2))), inverse(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))))), inverse(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))), inverse(multiply(X, b2)))))), a2)
% 0.21/0.42 = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.21/0.42 multiply(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))), inverse(multiply(X, inverse(multiply(X, b2))))), a2)
% 0.21/0.42 = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.21/0.42 a2
% 0.21/0.42 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.42
% 0.21/0.42 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------