TSTP Solution File: GRP510-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP510-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:39:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  30 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (  29 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z),inverse(multiply(X,Z))) = Y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(Y,X),inverse(multiply(Y,Z))))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(Z,X),U),Y))) = inverse(multiply(Z,U)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(U,Z),inverse(multiply(U,X)))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(Y,X),inverse(Z)))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(U,Y),inverse(multiply(U,Z)))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[3,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(Y,inverse(multiply(multiply(Z,multiply(Y,U)),inverse(multiply(Z,X))))))) = U,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,inverse(multiply(Y,Z))),inverse(X)) = inverse(multiply(Y,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X,multiply(Y,inverse(multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z))))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[3,4,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(U,inverse(multiply(multiply(V,multiply(U,X)),inverse(multiply(V,Z)))))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),inverse(X)) = inverse(Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X),inverse(multiply(Y,inverse(Y)))) = inverse(X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(Y,X),Z))) = inverse(multiply(Y,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[27,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X,inverse(multiply(X,Y)))) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[14,30,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X,inverse(Y))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(Z,X),inverse(multiply(Z,Y)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[7,30,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(U,inverse(multiply(multiply(U,X),inverse(Z))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[21,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(Y,inverse(multiply(multiply(Y,Z),inverse(X)))))) = Z,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[11,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(Z,inverse(X))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[6,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X,inverse(Y))) = inverse(multiply(Z,inverse(multiply(multiply(Z,Y),inverse(X))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[38,42,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(X,inverse(Y)))) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[39,43,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(X)) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[27,33,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(51,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(Y)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[44,47,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(52,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(Y)) = inverse(multiply(Y,inverse(X))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[47,44,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(55,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X)) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[44,47,52,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(67,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X),multiply(Y,inverse(Y))) = inverse(X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[28,52,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    multiply(X,Y) = multiply(Y,X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[51,47,theory(equality)]),55,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(72,plain,
    multiply(a2,multiply(inverse(b2),b2)) != a2,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_2,69,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    multiply(X,multiply(Y,inverse(Y))) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[67,55,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    multiply(X,multiply(inverse(Y),Y)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[75,55,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(79,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[72,78,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GRP510-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 10:21:57 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  "."
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T10:21:57
% 0.20/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-06-13T10:21:57
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  #||
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.55  ||#
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.55  ;       184 formulas have been input or derived (from 16 formulas).
% 0.20/0.55  ;        79 (43%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.20/0.55  ;           46 (58%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.55  ;           33 (42%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.55  ; 
% 0.20/0.55  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.001   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (2 calls)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.008  14%   Process new row              (175 calls)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.001   2%   Resolution                   (30 calls)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.006  11%   Paramodulation               (15 calls)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.008  14%   Forward simplification       (140 calls)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.006  11%   Backward simplification      (79 calls)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.005   9%   Ordering                     (451 calls)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.001   2%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.021  37%   Other
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.057        Total
% 0.20/0.55  ;     0.061        Real time
% 0.20/0.55  ; 
% 0.20/0.55  ; Term-hash-array has 371 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.55  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.55  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.55  ; Path-index has 153 entries (205 at peak, 427 added, 274 deleted).
% 0.20/0.55  ; Path-index has 746 nodes (753 at peak, 998 added, 252 deleted).
% 0.20/0.55  ; Trie-index has 153 entries (205 at peak, 427 added, 274 deleted).
% 0.20/0.55  ; Trie-index has 598 nodes (866 at peak, 1,715 added, 1,117 deleted).
% 0.20/0.55  ; Retrieved 226 generalization terms in 854 calls.
% 0.20/0.55  ; Retrieved 371 instance terms in 86 calls.
% 0.20/0.55  ; Retrieved 797 unifiable terms in 104 calls.
% 0.20/0.55  ; 
% 0.20/0.55  ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 0.20/0.55  ;     3 with value 19              2 with value 20
% 0.20/0.55  ; The agenda of rows to give has 25 entries:
% 0.20/0.55  ;     6 with value (4 18)          1 with value (4 23)           1 with value (4 30)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     3 with value (4 19)          2 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 31)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     1 with value (4 20)          1 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 32)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     2 with value (4 21)          1 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 36)
% 0.20/0.55  ;     2 with value (4 22)          2 with value (4 29)
% 0.20/0.55  Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.55    0.062 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.55    0.053741 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.55    0.008088 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.55    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.55    0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.55    5,474,768 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.55  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.55  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T10:21:57
% 0.20/0.55  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.55  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------