TSTP Solution File: GRP496-1 by Toma---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Toma---0.4
% Problem  : GRP496-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : toma --casc %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:15:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.29  % Problem    : GRP496-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.08/0.31  % Command    : toma --casc %s
% 0.09/0.51  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.51  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.51  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.51  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.51  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.51  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.51  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.51  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 23:44:21 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.52  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.66  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.66  original problem:
% 0.13/0.66  axioms:
% 0.13/0.66  double_divide(double_divide(identity(), double_divide(A, double_divide(B, identity()))), double_divide(double_divide(B, double_divide(C, A)), identity())) = C
% 0.13/0.66  multiply(A, B) = double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity())
% 0.13/0.66  inverse(A) = double_divide(A, identity())
% 0.13/0.66  identity() = double_divide(A, inverse(A))
% 0.13/0.66  goal:
% 0.13/0.66  multiply(inverse(a1()), a1()) != identity()
% 0.13/0.66  To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.13/0.66  it suffices to show that multiply(inverse(a1()), a1()) = identity() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.13/0.66  Here is an equational proof:
% 0.13/0.66  0: double_divide(double_divide(identity(), double_divide(X0, double_divide(X1, identity()))), double_divide(double_divide(X1, double_divide(X2, X0)), identity())) = X2.
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  1: multiply(X0, X1) = double_divide(double_divide(X1, X0), identity()).
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  2: inverse(X0) = double_divide(X0, identity()).
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  3: identity() = double_divide(X0, inverse(X0)).
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  4: double_divide(double_divide(identity(), double_divide(X0, inverse(X1))), inverse(double_divide(X1, double_divide(X2, X0)))) = X2.
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Rewrite equation 0,
% 0.13/0.66                 lhs with equations [2,2]
% 0.13/0.66                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  5: multiply(X0, X1) = inverse(double_divide(X1, X0)).
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Rewrite equation 1,
% 0.13/0.66                 lhs with equations []
% 0.13/0.66                 rhs with equations [2].
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  6: inverse(identity()) = identity().
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: A critical pair between equations 4 and 3.
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  17: double_divide(identity(), identity()) = identity().
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Rewrite equation 6,
% 0.13/0.66                 lhs with equations [2]
% 0.13/0.66                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  18: identity() = double_divide(X0, double_divide(X0, identity())).
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Rewrite equation 3,
% 0.13/0.66                 lhs with equations []
% 0.13/0.66                 rhs with equations [2].
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  19: multiply(X0, X1) = double_divide(double_divide(X1, X0), identity()).
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Rewrite equation 5,
% 0.13/0.66                 lhs with equations []
% 0.13/0.66                 rhs with equations [2].
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  21: multiply(inverse(a1()), a1()) = identity().
% 0.13/0.66  Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [2,19,18,17]
% 0.13/0.66                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.13/0.66  
% 0.13/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------