TSTP Solution File: GRP492-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : GRP492-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:18:39 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP492-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 00:34:00 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.41  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.45  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.45  Axiom 1 (inverse): inverse(X) = double_divide(X, identity).
% 0.20/0.45  Axiom 2 (identity): identity = double_divide(X, inverse(X)).
% 0.20/0.45  Axiom 3 (multiply): multiply(X, Y) = double_divide(double_divide(Y, X), identity).
% 0.20/0.45  Axiom 4 (single_axiom): double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, Y), identity), double_divide(Z, Y)))) = Z.
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 5: inverse(double_divide(X, Y)) = multiply(Y, X).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(double_divide(X, Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(X, Y), identity)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 3 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(Y, X)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 6: double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(Y, X), double_divide(Z, Y)))) = Z.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(Y, X), double_divide(Z, Y))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X, Y)), double_divide(Z, Y))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X, Y), identity), double_divide(Z, Y))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 4 (single_axiom) }
% 0.20/0.45    Z
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 7: double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(Y), X)))) = Y.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(Y), X))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(Y), X), identity)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(Y), X), double_divide(Y, inverse(Y)))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.20/0.45    Y
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 8: multiply(inverse(X), X) = inverse(identity).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), X)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(double_divide(X, inverse(X)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(identity)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 9: double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity)))) = X.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(X), X))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.20/0.45    X
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 10: double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))) = identity.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity)))), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(identity)), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity)))), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.20/0.45    identity
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 11: inverse(identity) = identity.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(identity)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(identity)), X))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(identity)), X), identity)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(identity)), X), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.20/0.45    identity
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 12: multiply(X, identity) = X.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(X, identity)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(double_divide(identity, X))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), identity)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.20/0.45    X
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 13: double_divide(identity, inverse(X)) = X.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(identity, inverse(X))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(identity, inverse(X)), identity)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(X))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(X))), identity)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(X))), double_divide(identity, inverse(identity)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(X))), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(X))), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(X))), double_divide(identity, inverse(X))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(X))), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X), identity), double_divide(identity, inverse(X))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(identity, inverse(X))), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(X), double_divide(identity, inverse(X))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.20/0.45    X
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 14: inverse(inverse(X)) = X.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(inverse(X))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))), Y))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))), Y), identity)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))), Y), double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(X)), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(identity), inverse(X))))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))), Y), double_divide(X, double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(identity), inverse(X))))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))), Y), double_divide(X, multiply(inverse(identity), inverse(X))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))), Y), double_divide(X, multiply(identity, inverse(X))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))), Y), double_divide(X, inverse(double_divide(inverse(X), identity))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X))), Y), double_divide(X, inverse(inverse(inverse(X)))))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.20/0.45    X
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 15: double_divide(identity, X) = inverse(X).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(identity, X)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(X)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(X)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 16: multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), inverse(Y)) = inverse(X).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(inverse(X), Y), double_divide(identity, Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 13 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(X), Y))), double_divide(identity, Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(identity, inverse(multiply(inverse(X), Y)))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(X)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 17: multiply(multiply(X, Y), inverse(Y)) = X.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(X, Y), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(multiply(X, identity), Y), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(inverse(double_divide(identity, X)), Y), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 16 }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(double_divide(identity, X))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(X, identity)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.20/0.45    X
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 18: double_divide(X, multiply(double_divide(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X)), inverse(Z))) = Y.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(X, multiply(double_divide(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X)), inverse(Z)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(X, inverse(double_divide(inverse(Z), double_divide(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X)))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(X, double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(Z), double_divide(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X)))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 13 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(X)), double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(Z), double_divide(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X)))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(X)), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(multiply(inverse(Z), X), inverse(X)), double_divide(Y, multiply(inverse(Z), X)))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.20/0.45    Y
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 19: multiply(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), inverse(Y)) = inverse(X).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(X, multiply(inverse(Y), identity)), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(identity, multiply(double_divide(X, multiply(inverse(Y), identity)), inverse(Y))), double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 18 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(X, double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(identity))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(X, identity)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(X)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 20: double_divide(X, inverse(Y)) = multiply(inverse(X), Y).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(X, inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 17 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(double_divide(X, inverse(Y)), inverse(Y)), inverse(inverse(Y)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 19 }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), inverse(inverse(Y)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), Y)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 21: double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X), multiply(inverse(Y), X)), inverse(Y)) = identity.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X), multiply(inverse(Y), X)), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X), multiply(inverse(Y), X)), multiply(multiply(inverse(Y), X), inverse(X)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X), multiply(inverse(Y), X)), inverse(double_divide(inverse(X), multiply(inverse(Y), X))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (identity) R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    identity
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 22: multiply(double_divide(X, multiply(Y, Z)), multiply(Y, Z)) = inverse(X).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(X, multiply(Y, Z)), multiply(Y, Z))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(X, multiply(Y, Z)), inverse(double_divide(Z, Y)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(X, inverse(double_divide(Z, Y))), inverse(double_divide(Z, Y)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 19 }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(X)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 23: multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), Y)) = Y.
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(inverse(inverse(X)), multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(X), identity), multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(X), inverse(identity)), multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(X), multiply(inverse(X), X)), multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(double_divide(identity, Z), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), Z), double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X), multiply(inverse(X), X)), inverse(X))))), multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 21 }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(double_divide(identity, Z), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), Z), identity))), multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 21 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(double_divide(identity, Z), double_divide(identity, double_divide(multiply(inverse(X), Z), double_divide(double_divide(inverse(Y), multiply(inverse(X), Y)), inverse(X))))), multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(double_divide(inverse(Y), multiply(inverse(X), Y)), multiply(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 22 }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.20/0.45    Y
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 24: multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y)) = double_divide(X, Y).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(inverse(X), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 22 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(double_divide(X, multiply(Y, identity)), multiply(Y, identity)), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(double_divide(X, Y), multiply(Y, identity)), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(double_divide(X, Y), Y), inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 17 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(X, Y)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 25: double_divide(inverse(X), Y) = multiply(X, inverse(Y)).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(inverse(X), Y)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 23 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), double_divide(inverse(X), Y)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(X, multiply(inverse(X), multiply(inverse(inverse(X)), inverse(Y))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 23 }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(X, inverse(Y))
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Lemma 26: inverse(multiply(X, Y)) = double_divide(Y, X).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(multiply(X, Y))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(inverse(double_divide(Y, X)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.20/0.45    double_divide(Y, X)
% 0.20/0.45  
% 0.20/0.45  Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms_3): multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3) = multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3)).
% 0.20/0.45  Proof:
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    multiply(multiply(inverse(inverse(a3)), b3), c3)
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(double_divide(c3, multiply(inverse(inverse(a3)), b3)))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 20 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(double_divide(c3, double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(multiply(inverse(c3), inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), inverse(b3)))))
% 0.20/0.45  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.20/0.45    inverse(multiply(inverse(c3), multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 20 R->L }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(double_divide(c3, inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3)))))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 26 R->L }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), c3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 18 R->L }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(a3), multiply(double_divide(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), c3), multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), inverse(b3)))))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(multiply(multiply(double_divide(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), c3), multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), inverse(b3)), inverse(a3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), c3)), inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3)))), inverse(b3)), inverse(a3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(double_divide(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), c3)))), inverse(b3)), inverse(a3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 24 }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), c3))), b3), inverse(a3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 25 }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(multiply(double_divide(multiply(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3)), inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), c3)))), b3), inverse(a3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(multiply(double_divide(multiply(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3)), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(b3), inverse(a3))), c3)), b3), inverse(a3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 23 }
% 0.20/0.46    inverse(multiply(double_divide(c3, b3), inverse(a3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 26 }
% 0.20/0.46    double_divide(inverse(a3), double_divide(c3, b3))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 25 }
% 0.20/0.46    multiply(a3, inverse(double_divide(c3, b3)))
% 0.20/0.46  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.20/0.46    multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3))
% 0.20/0.46  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------