TSTP Solution File: GRP487-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GRP487-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:48:42 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(identity,axiom,
identity = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.a4iqKNy2t1/E---3.1_18663.p',identity) ).
cnf(inverse,axiom,
inverse(X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.a4iqKNy2t1/E---3.1_18663.p',inverse) ).
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X2,X3))),X2),identity)) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.a4iqKNy2t1/E---3.1_18663.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.a4iqKNy2t1/E---3.1_18663.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.a4iqKNy2t1/E---3.1_18663.p',multiply) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
identity = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
identity ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
inverse(X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
inverse ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X2,X3))),X2),identity)) = X3,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
double_divide(X1,double_divide(X1,identity)) = identity,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity,identity),double_divide(X1,identity)),identity)) = identity,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
prove_these_axioms_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(identity,identity),double_divide(identity,identity)) = identity,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
multiply(double_divide(a1,identity),a1) != identity,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),identity)),double_divide(identity,identity)),identity)) = double_divide(identity,identity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity,identity),identity),identity)) = identity,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
double_divide(identity,identity) != identity,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_8]),c_0_11]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : GRP487-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:40:04 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.a4iqKNy2t1/E---3.1_18663.p
% 0.16/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # new_bool_3 with pid 18741 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 18745 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.16/0.44 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.16/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.16/0.44 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.16/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Paramodulations : 18
% 0.16/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 12
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 0.16/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 7
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.16/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 476
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1420 pages
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.16/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------