TSTP Solution File: GRP478-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : GRP478-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:19:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.96s 1.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : GRP478-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 12:22:09 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.96/1.27  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.96/1.27  Process 24477 was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.96/1.27  Mon Jun 13 12:22:09 2022
% 0.96/1.27  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_24323_n005.cluster.edu".
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_24323_n005.cluster.edu
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.96/1.27  set(auto2).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.96/1.27      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.96/1.27      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.96/1.27      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.96/1.27  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.96/1.27  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.96/1.27  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.96/1.27  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.96/1.27  clear(print_given).
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (3 formulas)
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  Auto_denials:
% 0.96/1.27    % copying label prove_these_axioms_1 to answer in negative clause
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  % Assigning unary symbol inverse kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (6).
% 0.96/1.27  Function symbol KB weights:  a1=1. b1=1. divide=1. multiply=1. inverse=0.
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.96/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.96/1.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  % Proof 1 at 0.25 (+ 0.01) seconds: prove_these_axioms_1.
% 0.96/1.27  % Length of proof is 23.
% 0.96/1.27  % Level of proof is 10.
% 0.96/1.27  % Maximum clause weight is 28.000.
% 0.96/1.27  % Given clauses 30.
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  1 multiply(A,B) = divide(A,inverse(B)) # label(multiply) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.96/1.27  2 divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,A),B),divide(C,divide(B,D)))),D) = C # label(single_axiom) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.96/1.27  3 multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) # label(prove_these_axioms_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_these_axioms_1).  [assumption].
% 0.96/1.27  4 divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1)) != divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1)) # answer(prove_these_axioms_1).  [copy(3),rewrite([1(4),1(9)]),flip(a)].
% 0.96/1.27  5 divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,A),inverse(divide(divide(divide(B,B),C),divide(D,divide(C,E))))),divide(F,D))),E) = F.  [para(2(a,1),2(a,1,1,1,2,2))].
% 0.96/1.27  6 inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,A),B),divide(C,divide(B,divide(D,E))))) = divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(F,F),D),C)),E).  [para(2(a,1),2(a,1,1,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.96/1.27  15 divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,A),B),C)),D),divide(B,D)) = C.  [para(6(a,1),2(a,1,1))].
% 0.96/1.27  25 inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,A),B),divide(divide(C,D),divide(B,D)))) = C.  [para(6(a,2),5(a,1)),rewrite([2(10)])].
% 0.96/1.27  49 divide(divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,A),B),C)),D),E),divide(F,E)) = divide(C,divide(F,divide(B,D))).  [para(6(a,1),15(a,1,1,1))].
% 0.96/1.27  52 divide(divide(inverse(divide(A,B)),C),divide(divide(D,inverse(divide(divide(divide(E,E),D),A))),C)) = B.  [para(15(a,1),15(a,1,1,1,1,1))].
% 0.96/1.27  62 divide(divide(A,B),divide(C,B)) = divide(divide(A,D),divide(C,D)).  [para(25(a,1),15(a,1,1,1))].
% 0.96/1.27  81 divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,B),divide(C,B)),D)),E),divide(divide(C,A),E)) = D.  [para(62(a,1),15(a,1,1,1,1,1))].
% 0.96/1.27  82 divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,A),B),divide(C,B))),D),divide(E,D)) = divide(C,E).  [para(62(a,1),15(a,1,1,1,1))].
% 0.96/1.27  84 divide(divide(A,B),divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(C,C),D),E)),F),B)) = divide(divide(A,divide(D,F)),E).  [para(15(a,1),62(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.96/1.27  169 divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,B),C),D)),divide(E,A)),divide(C,divide(E,B))) = D.  [para(2(a,1),81(a,1,1,1,1,1,2)),rewrite([84(14)])].
% 0.96/1.27  244 divide(divide(A,B),divide(C,divide(B,D))) = divide(divide(A,E),divide(C,divide(E,D))).  [para(82(a,1),62(a,1,1)),rewrite([49(13)])].
% 0.96/1.27  1339 divide(A,divide(B,inverse(divide(divide(divide(C,C),B),divide(divide(D,D),E))))) = divide(A,E).  [para(52(a,1),82(a,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.96/1.27  1415 divide(A,inverse(divide(divide(divide(B,B),A),divide(divide(C,C),D)))) = D.  [para(1339(a,1),15(a,1,1,1,1)),rewrite([15(7)]),flip(a)].
% 0.96/1.27  1444 divide(divide(A,B),divide(C,divide(B,inverse(divide(divide(divide(D,D),E),divide(divide(F,F),V6)))))) = divide(divide(A,E),divide(C,V6)).  [para(1339(a,1),244(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.96/1.27  1493 inverse(divide(divide(divide(A,A),B),divide(C,C))) = B.  [para(1415(a,1),25(a,1,1,2,1)),rewrite([1444(11)])].
% 0.96/1.27  1733 divide(divide(A,B),divide(C,B)) = divide(A,C).  [para(1493(a,1),82(a,1,1,1))].
% 0.96/1.27  1744 divide(A,A) = divide(B,B).  [para(1493(a,1),169(a,1,1,1)),rewrite([1733(5)])].
% 0.96/1.27  1745 $F # answer(prove_these_axioms_1).  [resolve(1744,a,4,a)].
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  Given=30. Generated=3285. Kept=1743. proofs=1.
% 0.96/1.27  Usable=29. Sos=1626. Demods=1082. Limbo=19, Disabled=71. Hints=0.
% 0.96/1.27  Megabytes=3.87.
% 0.96/1.27  User_CPU=0.25, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1.
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.96/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.96/1.27  
% 0.96/1.27  Process 24477 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jun 13 12:22:10 2022
% 0.96/1.27  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------