TSTP Solution File: GRP477-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GRP477-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:48:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   34 (  34 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   34 (  33 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  113 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3),divide(X4,X3))),divide(X2,X1)) = X4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qI0JF7LN8m/E---3.1_19798.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qI0JF7LN8m/E---3.1_19798.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qI0JF7LN8m/E---3.1_19798.p',multiply) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3),divide(X4,X3))),divide(X2,X1)) = X4,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X4)),X5)),divide(X2,X1)) = inverse(divide(divide(divide(X4,X3),X6),divide(X5,X6))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3),divide(divide(X4,divide(X2,X1)),X3))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2))),divide(divide(X4,X5),inverse(divide(divide(divide(X5,X4),X6),divide(X1,X6))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),inverse(divide(divide(divide(X2,X1),X3),divide(X4,X3)))),X5),divide(X6,X5))),X4) = X6,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2))) = inverse(divide(divide(X1,X4),divide(X3,X4))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3),X4)),divide(X2,X1)),X3) = X4,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_4]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(X2,X3),inverse(divide(divide(divide(X3,X2),X4),divide(divide(X5,X6),X4))))) = divide(X1,divide(X6,X5)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(X3,X4),X5),divide(X6,X5))),X2))) = inverse(divide(divide(X1,divide(X4,X3)),X6)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X2),inverse(divide(divide(divide(X2,X1),X3),divide(divide(X4,X5),X3)))) = divide(X5,X4),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,X3))),divide(divide(X4,X5),inverse(divide(divide(divide(X5,X4),X3),X1)))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_11]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(divide(X1,divide(X2,X3)),X4),divide(divide(X5,X6),X4))) = divide(divide(inverse(divide(X6,X5)),divide(X3,X2)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    divide(divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(X3,X4)),X5),divide(divide(X4,X3),X5)) = divide(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    inverse(divide(X1,divide(divide(X2,divide(divide(X3,X4),inverse(divide(divide(divide(X4,X3),X5),X1)))),X5))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),inverse(divide(X3,X4))),inverse(divide(X4,X3))) = divide(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(X3,X4),inverse(divide(X2,X1)))) = divide(X4,X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),inverse(divide(X2,X1))),X3)) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,inverse(X2)),X2) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_19]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    inverse(divide(X1,X2)) = divide(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(X2,X3),divide(X2,X3))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    prove_these_axioms_3 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)) = divide(divide(X1,X4),divide(X3,X4)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_8]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24]),c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)) = divide(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    divide(X1,inverse(inverse(X2))) = divide(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(c3),b3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X2),X3) = divide(X1,divide(X3,inverse(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_29]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09  % Problem    : GRP477-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:58:14 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qI0JF7LN8m/E---3.1_19798.p
% 0.14/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # new_bool_3 with pid 19876 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.44  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 19880 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Result found by U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.44  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.14/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.14/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.14/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 104
% 0.14/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 18
% 0.14/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 43
% 0.14/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 43
% 0.14/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.14/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 31
% 0.14/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 2465
% 0.14/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2059
% 0.14/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 2465
% 0.14/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1496
% 0.14/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 8
% 0.14/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.14/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1752
% 0.14/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1752
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 35
% 0.14/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.14/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 216
% 0.14/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 64
% 0.14/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 42287
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  # User time                : 0.034 s
% 0.14/0.44  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Total time               : 0.036 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1424 pages
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  # User time                : 0.034 s
% 0.14/0.44  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Total time               : 0.038 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.14/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------